Steinism' so to speak.
OT: We The People...
Jul 22, 2010
134 Replies
Follow replies to this discussion?
Aaaaaaaaaa-men, Brother !
You and Upitty the ones squealing like kids. You cut it out.
Nope, it is *the* definition.
Utter nonsense.
You've just shown yours, in spades.
I already knew the definition of "socialism". My "homework" was simply to show that you were doing nothing less than squealing in the breeze.
Agreeing with Mark's assessment of "statist" vs. "socialist/progressive/liberal" is "riding his coattails"? Another prime example of your squealing.
" snipped-for-privacy@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:
Thanks!
... snip
formatting link
>
formatting link
As someone put it, "They say they intend to rule benevolently, but make no mistake about it, they intend to rule!"
We'll just put you in the Stein/Mark column then. Hard-core to the right because you have a closed mind and simply don't know any better. It *is* hard to see with your head up your (and other's) ass. Put on a brown shirt and start marching, sucker!
Crap. You put me in that column *long* ago, just as I put you in the Upitty column way back. Rightfully, BTW.
Leftist loon without a lick of sense.
You're the one with his head firmly up Uppity's ass. It's actually sorta mutual. The only reason you to don't have spine problems is that leftist loons have no spine.
No you....no YOU... no YOU LOL gawd... you stay up all night to write these super-cool come-backs? Man, you suck!
No, I don't lay awake nights trying to be liked by you or Upitty. You may think you deserve such treatment, but that's just a common leftist's fantasy.
.. snip
Psst, krw, you're getting muddy.
formatting link
>>
formatting link
>
Yep, thats for sure. I crack up every time I read your sig. Don't know many Liberals, Progressives or whatever they call themselves these days that have much if any ammo or rounds. They are at a disadvantage in that respect!
haha Rich
Please differentiate your comments from my post. The last sentence above was not mine, but yours.
I don't know how that posted that way. Certainly not intentional.
Of course he's getting muddy. He rolls around in the same dirt as you.
I took a shower. ...needed it.
The definition of "socialism" requires OWNERSHIP of the means of production. It is not socialism for the government to "control" the means of production, something they have always done with regulations, taxes, fines, and so forth.
Can the government seize the means of production at a whim? If so then it owns them regardless of any paper that says otherwise.
ANY government can do that. That they Can does not make them Socialist.
And we all know how well the planned economies have worked out.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required