- posted
12 years ago
OT Mariano Rivera - lumberjack
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
What? He's never heard of a little glue and a coupla brads? Where's his greenness?
-- A sound mind in a sound body is a short but full description of a happy state in this world. -- John Locke
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
So what's your question? I appreciate your using "OT" but ... it's badly over-used here, especially since there is nothing, nada, resembling a question about ANYthing of any kind; only useless verbosty! Try a group that has something to do with baseball bats where you (gasp!) will be ON topic! And note that this group's name is NOT "ot"!
Note that I have no vendetta or anything similar toward you; but this group doesn't need all the "ot" egoes running around it, although you did make a weak attempt at putting it on topic.
HTH,
Twayne`
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
In future it would be most helpful if you provided a list of the OT post topics that you consider sufficiently on topic so I could ignore it. Thanks. ;)
R- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
You must be a hell of a lot of fun to hang out with. Do you go to an event with friends and allow no one to talk about anything other than the event?
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
List of acceptable OTs:
- Gas prices
- Home/Shop renovations and maintenance, especially anything electrical
- Injuries
- Global warming/cooling (NOT!) -- LOL!
- Impedance and related words (see #2)
- Baseball bat statistics (NOT!) -- LOL!
- Anything shop related, metal working for instance.
- Tool making
- Lists of OT dos and dont's
- Multimedia/youtube links that don't suck!
This is just a start. And please don't take it too seriously, unless you're posting off-topic. ;)
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Oops, #5 was supposed to be a NOT!
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Of the 28 posts that Twayne responded to in the last 60 days (He did not initiate any posts in those 60 days and I delete posts more than 60 days old, so I can't check further), 90% of them were admonishing people for posting OT messages. A couple of OT posters were not admonished because he had an interest in the message and responded to them. The most egregious OT response to a long time and prolific member was the following exchange.
Robotoy sends
------------------------------ Twayne responds. Then take some of that "strength" and apply it to relevant groups. Perhaps run your lazy ego thru a table saw while you're at it.
------------------------------
I have never, in all my years of usenet, ever used personal attacks or name calling on a poster, but I am going to use one now. Hold on a second...
......, ... ............. ... .... ..... .. .... . .... ... ....... ..., .........
OK, done. Sorry for the bad language.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Why are you talking to this twit as if what he says makes any sense? Honestly, I've never seen such an idiot as Twayne so full of himself, yet having so little to contribute.
He's too dull to realize that "OT" in the headers can be used to filter out all messages not on topic. Hell, even a pet cockroach is smarter than that.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Dave wrote the following:
He wants to see and read OT messages so that he can perform his netcop duties. Otherwise, he has no raison d'etre.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
You're right. It's pretty sad though. I guess everybody needs to put a purpose to their existence.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
The subject it's self is O/T.
Next.
Lew
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Is that twit still around. LOL