Wait! Am I in the wrong ng?
Isn't this rec.overthink-everything?
Wait! Am I in the wrong ng?
Isn't this rec.overthink-everything?
Bill wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@news4.newsguy.com:
That's fair. That joint was not a cabinetry joint, which is the subject we're mainly concerned with. It was a joint from the ship-building or timber-framing world. Interesting from an engineering standpoint, and interesting from a historical standpoint (as others noted, exceptionally complex joints were used in ship-building and timber-framing back to the
1300's), but not especially relevant to furniture.John
Who is this "we"? This isn't rec.fine-furniture-making.
"J. Clarke" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@news.eternal-september.org:
Ah, "we" is the participants in the wreck. Having watched it for a while now, cabinetry of one kind or another - how to do it, what tools to use, etc, etc - is the bulk of the on-topic discussion. Which isn't to say that other wood working topics aren't discussed (not to mention any number of off-topic topics). But furniture has been the core as far back as I can remember.
John
The "core" perhaps but hardly the totality.
However it's clear that you want to be netnanny and you need to get over that because nobody likes a netnanny.
I think you owe everyone who read your post an apology.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required