biscuits do absolutely nothing

I published a note to a fine wood working book at one time. Some other person posted the FWW Magazine article, and then a follow-up article I believe.

See Practical Design -- Solutions and Strategies

From FWW

Article Choosing the Strongest Joinery for Doors Page 52

Rail & Stile type joint.

Dowel -- 1800 lbs. Loose Tenon & M&T 2500 Lbs. Two Biscuits 2700 Three Biscuits 2900

I think the test was redone with slightly different results -- but not significant for most applications.

Reply to
WillR
Loading thread data ...

I recall Fine Woodworking published a study of various (non-mechanical) joints. Mortise and tenon was the strongest and when it failed, it did so slowly. The joint held together by biscuits was surprisingly strong as a T-joint but when it failed, it did so without much warning. For an edge-to-edge joint, biscuits add a little additional strength over a plain butt joint. Biscuits work exceptionally well with MDF and chipboard where other types of joints often fall short. A butt joint is the weakest of all as there is less glue surface area. It is the glue-surface area that effects overall strength, and since bicuits increases glue area it adds strength, similar to a spline.

Reply to
Phisherman

I betcha it has more to do with the material by the cutter....

Reply to
bridger

I'm torn,

Yes they add stregnth...no they don't add stregnth. What's a poor newbie to do. I was planning a coffe table with a shelf. As I don't have the skills to do a good M&T yet and I don't want to waste wood (makore), I thought I would use biscuits on the stretchers between to legs. I'm concerned about the amount of shear the joint will be able to handle with the weight of the wood and 100 of SWMBO's magazines piled on the shelf (I'm not concerend about the table top as it is supported by the legs).

I think I've determined that I shouldn't use the biscuits and should just keep practising my M&T's tell I get it right. Thoughts?

Reply to
mrcomp_ca

You're going to have to make up your own mind, but consider this. There's a great deal of woodworkers out there (and here) that own and use biscuit joiners. I'm one of them. I'd wager that most of owners of these machines use them for edge joining boards to make wider panels just like the one you're considering. If these panels were prone to easy failure or extremely difficult to construct with the aid of a biscuit joiner, there would be a whole lot of screaming going on. There isn't. Need I say more?

Reply to
Upscale

Biscuits do add *some* structural strength, (long grain to long grain but the total surface area of the biscuits is probably minimal compared to the surface are of the boards to be glued. However one good reason to use them, is that they stabilize the joint during glue up. Using modern glues, it's been demonstrated time and time again that in long grain to long grain glue joints, it's usually the wood itself that will fail before the glue joint fails. While the biscuits probably don't add all that much to the strength of the joint, they will aid dramatically in producing a perfectly flat surface after gluing, (or one that needs minimal sanding). By always cutting the biscuit slots from the top of the boards, this will account for any minor variations in the width of the boards. If the application was so extreme that wood failure is a possibility, (i.e. grandsons using a coffee table as a launching platform to jump to the couch ) I wouldn't depend on biscuits or dowels, but would cross brace the wood from the backside, maybe even to the point of laminating a hardboard on the back. (Either that, or traumatizing a grandson for life).*

However, I have used biscuits, with a good deal of success in strengthen end grain to end grain on cabinet faceframes. In this particular instance, even a single biscuit would almost double the glue surface. And if you're trying to mount the face frames without nail holes, using biscuits to align the faceframe to the cabinet carcass while the glue dries is invaluable.

IMHO, biscuits are normally an acceptable substitute for dowels, in most instances. Most doweling jigs exactly center the holes in the boards and if the boards aren't exactly the same thickness, this can produce minor, but extremely annoying variations on the surface. Doweling jigs can be shimmed to offset the holes, but you're really getting touchy here.

Just chatting. Not preaching.

James....

*Two weeks ago, a grandson of mine was using a lower cabinet door (walnut) to climb on the kitchen cabinet to get to the cookies. The joints, nearest the hinges failed, on the door. I was able to fix the door, and I'm confident the repaired door will hold up just fine.

My grandson has a new found respect for Grandma's cabinets, too. One down. Three to go.

Reply to
J&KCopeland

damn, Will.. we're just too much alike.. rofl

mac

Please remove splinters before emailing

Reply to
mac davis

murphy says that the wider the board, the more likely someone who doesn't know better will measure diagonally..

mac

Please remove splinters before emailing

Reply to
mac davis

I don't know if this will help, but it helped me... when I got my 1st biscuit jointer, I made a sample frame out of 1/3 fir, using a #10 biscuit in each corner and titebond III...

I let it sit a few days, then put it in the vice and started applying a r9ocking motion to it like a bookcase or cabinet might get when moved...

It took a while, but I got all 4 corners loose, and every one broke the wood around the joint, not the biscuit.. those lil' suckers really glue in there!

mac

Please remove splinters before emailing

Reply to
mac davis

Biscuits will work well on the stretchers and also on the apron to leg joint. If your apron is approx. 4" a #20 should be used, but an S-6 biscuit works best.

formatting link

Reply to
Rumpty

Consider the biscuits to be first glued into the wood. I.E. suppose them to be an integral part of the wood, being embedded in it. Now examine the cross-section [edge-on] of the biscuits and the wood. The area of wood far exceeds that of the biscuits. When glued, the area of wood glued edge to edge far exceeds that of the biscuits in the cross-sectional view. That is, the amount of glue on the wood to wood area is the major factor in the gluing.

Look at the material used for biscuits. If it was steel, then it would help strengthen the joint in that it would be less likely to flex and so break, even at a slight distance from the joint within the dimensions of the biscuit. The biscuit material is relatively so weak that it does nothing of any consequence like that.

The biscuits help line up the material. Keep using them for that purpose. I think they do a great job of that.

Now, this topic has been beaten to death over and over, so let's leave it be and concentrate on more important topics like Antivirus software, whether or not you need to learn AutoCad before you learn to use a hammer, and religion B.S. and the other interesting OT redneck discussions that fill this forum.

Reply to
Guess who

"mrcomp_ca" wrote in news:1117636493.789674.223330 @g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

I'm not sure of your table design, and so cannot comment on that, however:

Dowels are still considered 'old school' at some of the 'fine woodworking' programs of note. And that is a term of pride, son.

For those without a wizened old mentor, you might look at the Miller Dowel system, as a means of making a strong, beautiful, repeatable joint. I haven't tried it yet, but several of my experienced woodworking friends in analog life have, and speak of it with high regard.

I have used traditional dowels, with good results, and would do so again. And I built bathroom vanity drawers with rabbets and biscuits in the project currently on my bench, because my dovetail jig would not accomodate the thick stock I had already cut to less than jointer length. And I didn't want to hand cut DTs for 8 drawers in a bathroom.

Just a thought. No financial interest, etc.

Patriarch

Reply to
Patriarch

Thanks alot guys, I appreciate all the feedback.

Reply to
mrcomp_ca

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.