Yes it does relate to this thread - you replied to this message by Andy
"> If it's only a one way switch, as this is, then it doesn't matter.
The poster was correct in saying in this situation, for a 1 way switch, it
didn't matter each wire went where. He also pointed out (just so the poster
didn't assume it was also the case for more ways) that had it been a 2 way
switch then it would have mattered where the wires went.
Your reply to that (in other branch of thread - not that included at the top
of this message) was:
Which is an incorrect statement - especially as you then said later:
"I know the placement of wires matters in 2 way switches".
The only thing I can see is that you were being troll-like in making a vague
confusing reply of "No it wouldn't" meaning it didn't matter because it
wasn't a 2 way switch (which was also what the poster said) - but knowing
that it would be mis-understood to mean that the wiring didn't matter on 2
way switches. This replying then went on giving obtuse replies - not
clearing it up early by saying "It doesn't matter in this situation because
its a 1 way switch".
That, to me, is troll-like behaviour.
Archers, mate. She's the fake Geordie.
Actually it's all terribly interesting right now. David's in a real state
over the bovine TB spreading through his beef *and* dairy herds, and not
only shot a badger dead recently (and was convicted, a terrible stain
on the character of our favourite parish councillor) but is now talking about
raising the drinking troughs above badger height. For light relief, he's
plotting to annoy Linda Snell by letting Joe Grundy pretend-lease 6 acres
of his land, so that Joe qualifies as running an Agricultural Enterprise
and will be able to re-erect the pole barn Linda agitated to have the
council order Joe to take down. And now Alan, the new right-on vicar, is
seriously contemplating a drug rehab centre in the parish, after his failed
attempt to help Luke who'd once stayed at Jill's on a farm holiday off the
heroin. He's got right up Matt Crawford's nose with this idea - oh, and
Matt is sh*gging Lilian, who's back from Guernsey and looking as if she
wants to settle down. Alistair's hitting the bottle and letting his vet
practice's finances go down the toilet, which Shula's just about to discover
(or maybe has, haven't listened for a couple of days).
Shall I go on? ;-)
Actually, what I meant was if it were a two way switch with a twin
coming from the light fitting it wouldn't matter which way round the
live and switch wire went into the two terminals that they were
required to go into, (L1 and L2, or similar).
If everyone would have just left it as my original answer, which was
simple as the OP wanted it wouldn't matter. When people keep sticking
irrellevant posts in threads it just confuses someone who doesn't
know, which generally the OP wouldn't.
If they wanted to know about two way switches they would ask about two
way switches, or buy a book.
Andy's post was perfectly clear (as is his wont), a small additional
amount of information that may have saved the Op (or someone else
reading the thread) a small amount of heart ache if they came across one
that was 2 way switched.
What then confused the matter was your reply to Andy and the ensuing
I wouldn't say his post was clear, it implies something else that I
It would have been far better if he was offering additional advice to
have pointed to a page somewhere on the web showing how to do it or
explain his comments fully rather than making generally unclear
| Actually, what I meant was if it were a two way switch with a twin
| coming from the light fitting it wouldn't matter which way round
| the live and switch wire went into the two terminals that they were
| required to go into, (L1 and L2, or similar).
If you've got a live and a switch live at the switch, and you put one into
L1 and one into L2, the light will never come one because a two-way switch
never shorts L1-L2. Does it?
| "Owain" wrote:
| >| Actually, what I meant was if it were a two way switch with a
| >| twin coming from the light fitting it wouldn't matter which
| >| way round the live and switch wire went into the two terminals
| >| that they were required to go into, (L1 and L2, or similar).
| >Buuuut ...
| >If you've got a live and a switch live at the switch, and you
| >put one into L1 and one into L2, the light will never come one
| >because a two-way switch never shorts L1-L2. Does it?
| Quite right, it doesn't. But that's not how a two way switch works.
| Draw a diagram, trace the route through the switches, then come back.
But you said "two way switch with a twin coming from the light fitting" and
"a live and switch wire" (switch wire singular) so you weren't describing
2-way switching and it does matter that one of the wire has to go into the
COM if you're using a 2-way switch as a 1-way.
| "Owain" wrote:
| I think you'll find if you follow the thread the topic moved to
| theories of two way switching.
Oh, sorry. I was still following the One True Original Thread and hadn't
realised that you were talking about the New Standard Revised International
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.