No. I am not going to answer anymore of your pointless posts.
Either post something worthwhile or I will ignore you.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Way to go den ...
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Well you asked how fast I would have been driving had I been driving the ambulance that had an accident. I already said it was going too fast. If I had been the driver I would have been going too fast or there wouldn't be an accident.
I think you should, I have answered your question so many times I am getting RSI.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
dennis@home wrote: .
ROFLMAO!
Dennis, you really are a priceless plonker!
I think this conclusively shows how carefully you read & comprehend posts.
My sister is a florist - its my DAUGHTER who is the paramedic.
My case rests.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
But do you have a PSV licence Dennis? Don't evade the question.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Don't evade the question Dennis. Do you have a PSV license? It's relevant to your ability to comment on the situation.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
You have written so much cr@p I don't even waste my time reading it anymore as you may have noticed.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!
Wanker!
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
There's another reason for that.... ;-)
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
I don't think you ever did. You scan for words that trigger boilerplate paranoia.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
No it isn't. It has no relevance at all to what you described. If you think it does then its another error by you.
Lets finish this so you can shut up....
1: driver sees person with dog starting to cross crossing so slows down.. no accident. 2: driver sees person start to cross doesn't slow down and hopes person moves out of the way. 2a: person is quick.. no accident 2b person is slow.. accident 2c person is deaf.. accident 2c person is drunk.. accident 2d person has mental problems.. accident 2e person is foreign and knows he has the right of way on the crossing.. accident 2f person is bloody minded and knows he has right of way.. accident 3 person has dog and is quick and dog is quick.. no accident. 3a person has dog and dog is slow.. accident 3b person has dog and dog is scared and freezes.. accident 3c person is quick but panics and forgets to pull in dog.. accident 3d person is quick but too weak to pull in dog.. accident 4 dog is out of control and can't be seen by driver.. accident 4a dog is out of control and can be seen by driver.. accident 5 driver goes through red light at junction too fast and hits car crossing.. accidentNow which of those accidents is not the drivers fault?
I added #5 because in principle its no different and everyone will know its not the car drivers fault.
Now shut up or provide the case information and I will show you who is right.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
I don't but I do have other things to do than argue with TMW.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
I have other people for that.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
What? You pay someone to masterbate you?
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Oh, so you don't have a PSV license. So you are not qualified to comment on an accident you didn't see involving a vehicle you cant drive?
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Oh no!!! Dennis will ignore me!!! My life is over!!!
Wanker.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
You described the crime.
No matter what anyone else says your description is a crime, they may have got away with it but it was a crime. Unless there is any real evidence it was either a crime or you are talking bollox. I can assure you that if they hit the person they wouldn't have a job if it was as you described.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
You got the correct sig I see.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
No, I described an incident.
Then why didn't the police take any action?
If they had hit you they would have been give a bleeding medal.
Ok, I'll give you another chance to answer a very simple question; If it was a 'crime' why didn't the police take action against my sister?
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Does he mean that there are more of him? :-(
Dave
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
You are very naive here The law states that you must step on the crossing to get priority. I assume that you are a driver that stops for pedestrians that are waiting to cross. How sad.
How long have you spent learning bollockese?
A pedestrian crossing does not start for a pedestrian until she, or he steps onto it. Dogs do not count, neither do cyclists, who are cyclists while holding a cycle
Care to test this in law ?
Dave