victorian/edwardian houses or new houses?

Jan 07, 2004 Last reply: 22 years ago 279 Replies

You are....so true.

No, it seems to have an endless capacity to ingest and regurgitate them with little alteration other than some corruption due to total incomprehension..

>

You are in cloud cuckoo land!

That sounds appealing.

< snip drivel >

Yah...well...no...fine ! :-)

And who pays YOUR wages? Phony Liar?

Confused eh!

Who is he or her?

I can just hear Janet Street Porter saying that,........

.. and amazingly seem to believe that they have everybody fooled into believing it.

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

No, but its obvious you have.

No surprises, there then.

you, not me.

I try to be..true...to myself.

Look at IMM. They have.

Remember he is more represntative than those of us who (gasp) can use computers, and do D-I-Y.

You keep hearing me? Do you dream of me too?

But the first time he's admitted it?

In message , Franz Heymann writes

It is also very much lighter than air and so as a gas is rapidly off up into the stratosphere and can escape. You need to worry when it reacts with oxygen to form tritiated water - then it can get into the food chain and do real damage.

To put this radioactivity into perspective 18keV electrons are only a little bit more energetic than the electron beam inside a colour TV tube.

Regards,

[snip]

I have now had a quick look with Google, using the search terms - Rubbia radioactive waste - and found a fair selection of papers. Researh on this process is going on in Holland and in Russia. (And probably elsewhere as well) The main motivation for it was originally that it would be a way of getting rid of the plutomium, and hence eliminate the possibility of that material getting into the hands of potential troublemakers.

[snip]

Franz

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required