(dug out of poor design rant thread)
On 14/04/2012 00:58, sm_jamieson wrote: > On Friday, April 13, 2012 9:04:24 PM UTC+1, Adrian C wrote: >> On 13/04/2012 19:27, Tim Streater wrote: >>
>>>*outside* of >>> the house. >>
>>>> Quite. We're currently shopping for a chimmney style cooker hood. I >>>> found one at John Lewis and downloaded the manual primarily for >>>> checking dimensions. However, the words "not designed for extracting >>>> steam" have now confused the selection process.
>>> By "chimney style" do you mean it's a faux chimney? The only type of >>> cooker hood that's worth a damn is one that extracts to the
> Nope, it's a real chimney, a witches top hat above the hob. And a flat >> roof overhead to vent through, so can't see how it would not extract >> steam.... >>
>>formatting link>>
>> But Manual Says No... >>
>
> A quick web search reveals that many extractor instructions contain the phrase "will not extract steam". There appears to be a couple of variants of the phrase so maybe it is copied from some kind of regulation document. > I don't get it. > Someone suggested maybe it means most of the steam will condense in the filters or grease trap (the wire grid). >
> I will have to choose an extractor hood soon also. >
> Can anyone explain ? >
> Simon.