Russian nuclear batteries ?

formatting link

Russian boffins at the Moscow Institute of Physics (MIPT) have emitted a prototype nuclear battery packing 3,300 milliwatt hours of energy per gram.

The paper, published in Diamond and Related Materials, describes a betavoltaic battery powered by the beta decay of the nickel-63 isotope giving 10 times the power of conventional commercial cells.

Betavoltaics themselves are nothing new, using semiconductors to convert the energy of beta decay into electricity, and found use briefly in the

1970s in pacemakers due to their longevity. However, cheaper chemical batteries with their higher power densities (if shorter lifespans) won the day.

The public perception and fear of all things radioactive at the time did the concept no favours either.

The team at MIPT have come up with a way to deal with the power density problem by using nickel-63 as the power source (and a known quantity thanks to earlier research in both Russia and Bristol) and Schottky barrier-based diamond electrodes for the energy conversion in a novel configuration.

200 of the diamond converters were interlaid with nickel-63 and stable nickel foil layers, with the power generated dependant on the thickness of the foil.

If the foil is too thick, the emitted electrons cannot escape due to self- absorption. However, make the foil too thin and the number of atoms undergoing decay over time is reduced. Using simulation tools, the team calculated that the sweet spot required the nickel-63 foil be 2 micrometres thick with the Schottky barrier diamond converter at 10 micrometres.

Manufacturing the converters presented its own particular challenges, with the team developing a way of growing diamond plates on a diamond substrate by first creating a damaged layer in the substrate through ion implantation, growing boron-doped diamond film on top and then using annealing to allow the recovery of the top layer.

Once the damaged layer was separated by electrochemical etching, the converter was fitted with ohmic and Schottky contacts.

Boffins used the process to create 200 converters from 20 substrates, stacking the things with the nickel-63 foil to create a battery with an open-circuit voltage of 1.02 V and a current of 1.27 ?A.

With a power density per cubic centimetre of 10 microwatts, a more economical manufacturing process and nickel-63 having a half life of 100 years, the researchers see potential for the battery to be used as a power source that does not need to be replaced in medical devices such as pacemakers.

The team also see opportunities for use in powering spacecraft systems such as memory chips with their own power supplies.

Going forwards, the boffins reckon that enriching the nickel-63 would proportionately increase the power, as would switching from a Schottky barrier diode to a diamond P-I-N structure.

With a shortage of nickel-63 production in Russia until at least the mid

2020s the team are also considering the possibility of using the diamond convertor technology with alternative isotypes such as carbon-14, which has a half life of 5,700 years.

The team in Bristol published research into using the carbon-14 isotype in 2016, incorporating the nuclear waste into a man-made diamond to ensure no unpleasant short-range radiation can escape.

Incorporating the Russian technology to boost power output would see more applications for the technology than just long-term low-power scenarios. ®

Reply to
Jethro_uk
Loading thread data ...

Yes I've often wondered about this as theoretically it could be a very big source of power. The snag has always been public perception, conveniently forgetting the trimphone with its betalite behind the numbers and vinyl record static removers on turntables using beta radiation.

Mention radiation and everyone runs a mile. Sad but true, best not tell everyone that t a good percentage of smoke detectors have a radio active isotope in them then!

Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

Sellotape a bunch of tritium/phosphor light emitting vials between some solar cells ...

Reply to
Andy Burns

People are morons. Really. Especially the ones who think they know something.

Forget smoke detectors. We are born, live and die under the most powerful nuclear reactor in the solar system.

As I say ****ing morons.

Reply to
Jethro_uk

But you don't tend to have the actual sun in your house.

A nuclear explosion on earth was probably perfectly safe too. If on the moon.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

There have been quite a few nuclear explosions on earth, and outside the immediate location they don't seem to have caused much harm.

Don't forget among the 16000 dead, 6000 injured and 2500 downright missing in the Tohuku Earthquake is the death toll from the Fukushima radiation leak. Which despite the best efforts of Tepco in the terrible design of the system has now reached....

One (probable).

Andy

Reply to
Vir Campestris

Drivel. The deaths have not finished and will continue foor decades.

formatting link

Reply to
harry

None. Almost certain

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Well seems the Welsh had better get used to it ...

formatting link

The government has confirmed it is considering putting taxpayers' money into a project to build a new nuclear power station at Wylfa in North Wales.

(contd)

Reply to
Jethro_uk

Thst the Hitachi ABWR isnt it?

cheap and cheerful but safe enough. Safer than the magnox it will replace

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Don't you read your links?

"there were no deaths caused by acute radiation syndrome. Given the uncertain health effects of low-dose radiation, cancer deaths cannot be ruled out. However, no discernible increase in the rate of cancer deaths is expected."

(The 1 is a Tepco worker whose family received compensation because he died of something that may (repeat MAY) have been caused by radiation.)

Andy

Reply to
Vir Campestris

Don't you read the links?

According to a 2012 Yomiuri Shimbun survey, 573 deaths have been certified as "disaster-related" by 13 municipalities affected by the Fukushima nuclea r disaster. These municipalities are in the no-entry, emergency evacuation preparation or expanded evacuation zones around the crippled Fukushima nucl ear plant.

Also you can expect the Japanese government to play down adverse efects as much as possible.

Reply to
harry

If you shout fire in a crowded theatre, and dozens of people are killed in the crush, were they killed by fire?

These people have died because they were moved or ran away. They were not killed by radiation, but by an unreasonable fear of it.

Andy

Reply to
Vir Campestris

+1
Reply to
newshound

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.