From some of my devices, I am taking out Duracell batteries that I had installed back in 2003 and 2004 with no problems; yes, they used to be that good. I normally mark dates on the batteries with a black marker. The thing is, Duracell is not going back to be close to any of my devices. After replacing the older batteries, new Duracell batteries with power left in them, and within months of installation, have been leaking. So far the crappy Duracells have ruined the following items for me, both at home (h) and in the office (o); the prices for the damaged items are approximate to what they cost:
2 Small adding/printing Canon calculators (o) $15 both 1 TI-89 Calculator (h) $150 2 300g x0.01 g jewelry scales (o) $20 both 1 Craftsman Engine Analyzer (h) $130 or so 1 Gilmour Garden Watering Timer (h) $38 2 "9 LED" flashlights (h) $6 both 1 2D cell Maglite Flashlight (h) $35 1 3D cell Maglite Flashlight (o) $45 1 2AA cell Maglite flashlight (mom's) $20 1 Analog Multimeter (h) $20 1 Garmin GPS12 (h) $150 1 Remote for HDTV top set box (h) $40 for the box and remoteIn most cases, the devices stopped working not because the batteries were dead, but because the leak had corroded and ruined the device's battery contacts.
The batteries affected are AA, AAA, D and 9V types. A couple of 9V batteries, with less than one year of installed in smoke detectors, were replaced as soon as the detectors began beeping. Those batteries were swollen and had open seams. About a month ago, I took one from a smoke detector dated 2004.
The defective batteries have come from different large size packs bought both at BJ's club or local reputable retailers.
I wonder why Consumer Reports continues to say that Duracell Batteries are good. Are they blind? Is Duracell selling the crappy batteries in the south east US only?
Thanks for paying attention to my rant.