Our office needs a new copier/printer and conventional wisdom seems to be that you must get a service agreement or lease or you'll end up with lots of problems, but I wonder if that is really the case?
The office prints or copies about 4-5000 pages a month (=about 150 a day) and an A4 copier that meets this volume can be had for as little as ?250 with a one-year onsite warranty. I can't help feeling that this should be enough without having to go for a fullblown service agreement, has anyone got experience of this?
Given that lease+service agreements seem to cost hundreds per quarter my feeling is that it would be cheaper to just buy a machine (and maybe pay another ?100 to extend the onsite warranty to 3 years), and then simply chuck the copier if it becomes unmanageble and get another. But the office manager is scared that they may get stuck with problems that a warranty wouldn't address (maybe paper jams etc?) and have to pay lots of ad hoc servicing bills. Am I being too naive about the tribulations of copiers? I should say that I normally work from home so I'm not the person who has to deal with demonic office equipment when it malfunctions!