OT Drivel in the press

Re helicopter crash at Leicester. If the tail rotor came off, the pilot became an instant passenger. He had zero control. He was not a hero. He WAS unlucky.

Reply to
harry
Loading thread data ...

But given he flew that job at least twice a fortnight, his usual flightpath had probably been chosen to be over wasteground, rather than over roads or areas where crowds might still be mooching about.

If it disintegrated rather than 'came off' he might have had some diminishing control?

Reply to
Andy Burns

Not necessarily.

Antitorque System Failure

Page 11-16

formatting link

i.e. If the helicopter has enough forward airspeed (close to cruising speed) when the failure occurs, and depending on the helicopter design, the vertical stabilizer may provide enough directional control to allow the pilot to maneuver the helicopter to a more desirable landing sight.

( So much for spellchuckers and auto proof reading apps.)

Reading from the top apparently the technique is to switch off power and allow the helcopter to autorotate. However this requires sufficient height to allow a soft landing which wasn't available in this case.

Pilots are specifically trained for such eventualities. And so he may have responded instinctively in a way which may have averted an even bigger disaster. Whether so doing qualified him as a hero i.e when its questionable whether he had any choice in the matter is indeed another question. Although it may make his death a bit less hard to take for those most affected by it. Although of course there's nothing to stop you from phoning up his family and putting them straight on the matter.

Maybe they're religious, so you could maybe put them straight on that subject as well while you're at it.

As with monkeys and Shakespeare its almost inevitable that you'll post something sensible now and again. Even if its only a sentence consisting of only three words.

michael adams

...

Reply to
michael adams

Usual ignorant bollocks from harry.

If you chop te collective and throttle you can autorotate down and then the main controls still work, except the rudder, but you cant climb.

He had limited control even with it totally gone

Enough to choose a little where to crash

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

I've seen it said you can do that from level flight to autorotate down in a controlled crash, but if it happens during a take-off, is there really much time/height to do that?

It was a twin-engine chopper, with two pilots, why don't they have dual tail-rotors?

Reply to
Andy Burns

No, tahts why he is dfead. But that is why he is dead in a palvce that was empty of other people

TBH not much goes wrong with tail rotors. Espeially shrouded ones.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

If you chop te collective and throttle,???

Reply to
FMurtz

No, tahts why he is dfead. But that is why he is dead in a palvce that was empty of other people More,????

Reply to
FMurtz

With the tail rotor falling off, the fuselage will instantly rotate (as in fact happened. The pilot has zero control of anything

formatting link

formatting link

Reply to
harry

Yes the problem is that if it was a gearbox failure it might have been difficult to actually get any autorotate to work. And it was far too low for it in any case. It sounds to me like not enough maintenance or a sudden catastrophic failure. Helicopters have far more checks than ordinary aircraft, for the reason we all know about. a pilot once told me, Helicopter pilots fall into two categories, those who have had a crash survived and are almost paranoid about checking things, and those who will have a crash.

Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

Apparently it was nearly new. Hence big panic at the manufacturers.

Reply to
harry

why don't you type with your fingers, not a pound of palethorpes best

Reply to
critcher

2 years old
Reply to
Andy Burns

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Exactly. In private hands, the hours spent flying would be really low.

Reply to
harry

Damn. He meant to type "f*ck off", but it came out wrong again.

Reply to
Richard

Reaction time is very short.

Reply to
bert

Thankfully nothing much goes wrong with helicopters in total.

Reply to
bert

The reason he crashed where he did was that helicopters fly over none inhabited spaces at low levels to avoid people getting knobbed off with the noise.

Reply to
harry

Something came off.

The pictures on the Beeb of it on the ground clearly showed tail rotor blades. I won't swear all of them, and obviously can't tell if it was going round.

Andy

Reply to
Vir Campestris

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.