Yeah, in an 'ideal world' someone doing something temporary that has good effect and is fully / easily reversible isn't generally an issue. However, it's when something (even if unforeseen) goes wrong and worse some one (rather than thing) gets damaged, then they will quickly look for scapegoats.
I see what you did there ... ;-)
I mentioned the 'desire line' the vehicles often took near the manhole in question (that brought them in contact with the manhole when traffic on either side of it should theoretically miss it). This 'desire line' is so strong that recently someone reversing out of a parking bay (not a good idea etc) reversed into the offside of a passing car that *should* have been on the other side of the road. It made quite a bang and made a mess of both vehicles (even at ~25 mph).
I felt sorry for both drivers (in as far as the outcome was concerned, wrong time wrong place etc) because the guy shouldn't really have been reversing out onto a live road (and are often doing so blind when bordered by SUV's / Vans etc), but very few seem to (want to) reverse
*into* these 90 degree parking bays ... and for the other driver being reversed into who may well have got away with it if he wasn't following the 'desire line' and was on the right side of the road. I believe the Highway Code allows you to 'make full use of the road', but only when it's safe to do so?Cheers, T i m