Is this dribble?

This device doesn't claim to "make" energy. There is energy all around us - it may be tapping into that somehow. As the report says, York Uni know what it is doing, however don't exactly know how.

Some Scientists, even if the thing works in front of them will disbelieve if they can't put numbers to it. Look at the ridicule of Eric Laithwaite by the established scientific community who carry the laws of physics around with them in their cases - he even invented the linear motor and Maglev train. He dared to say to them that something was happening in an experiment, outside the known laws of physics. Shock! Horror!!

Reply to
Doctor Drivel
Loading thread data ...

Although this is impossible anyway, lets suppose it was. It is not then an over unity device and is not producing more energy than is put in (which is claiming to "make" energy), it would just be getting it from somewhere else.

As the report says, York Uni know what

which is why they don't talk about it.

The linear motor and the Maglev train never were outside the laws of physics, they just thought they couldn't be made to work in an engineering sense.

Reply to
Bob Mannix

If you are referring to CERN, I think you may find he was referring to "dark matter", which fills up the spaces between galaxies, and not water heating!

Which is why they don't mention it, to preserve their reputation and rating.

There is no bottle, you are admiring the emperor's new clothes.

Reply to
Bob Mannix

Under what authority do you base that on? Don't say laws of physics please. radio waves is not energy all around us? Tesla was working on it until he died.

You are right it would not be an over-unity device as our understanding would have been raised a level or two. As we understand over-unity today it would be.

See through the Daily Mail tabloid tripe too. Despicable paper.

Maybe they know more than they are letting on.

I never said it was - but he a had a great inventive track record was ridiculed in other tests. Laithwaite went into giros and the likes, and was then ridiculed. he spend years putting his experiments in to the laws - probably frigged it to satisfy them.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

He was speaking in general of our understanding of how matter, etc worked.

Then they give sound bites to the press.

You can't even see the emperor, at least I see him naked.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

I refer to *your* line quoted a few lines above here "...something was happening in an experiment, outside the known laws of physics..."

Reply to
Bob Mannix

How long before dribble invokes his plantpot comparison routine?

Reply to
Paul Herber

Right now.. what a plantpot!!!

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

I cannot see that happening :-)

Still at least 99.9% efficient though.

Adam

Reply to
ARWadsworth

It can't, you pillock. Near 100% of the electricity is already converted into heat. If it saves on electricity it is getting energy from elsewhere.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

No point in trying to educate dribble. He already believes boilers can be more than 100% efficient and argues thus - despite how this figure is arrived at being explained to him.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Certain 'laws' of physics have been overturned - the most famous which did this was perhaps the theory of relativity. But in practical terms it was splitting hairs. Not turning an efficiency of near 100% into 300% or whatever daft amount you've been conned by again.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Radio waves are produced by a transmitter which is powered by electricity. You could harness those for other purposes but would remove those waves from others use in that area. You'd also need an enormous aerial array. And the transmitting company would sue you for stealing their power and win - as has been done before. If you mean naturally occurring radio waves these are so small as to be useless to power anything.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Please eff off as you are a total idiot.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

Please eff off as you are a total idiot.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

Please eff off as you are a total idiot.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

Please eff off as you are a total idiot.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

An over unity device

Is that the latest euphemism?

Do you have the URL for that latest cut and paste so that we can read the rest of it?

Reply to
andyrdhall

In message , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes

... which is why I'm not getting drawn into this

Reply to
geoff

Maxie, you are wise to ignore an idiot.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.