Is this dribble?

Although this is impossible anyway, lets suppose it was. It is not then an over unity device and is not producing more energy than is put in (which is claiming to "make" energy), it would just be getting it from somewhere else.

As the report says, York Uni know what

which is why they don't talk about it.

The linear motor and the Maglev train never were outside the laws of physics, they just thought they couldn't be made to work in an engineering sense.

If you are referring to CERN, I think you may find he was referring to "dark matter", which fills up the spaces between galaxies, and not water heating!

Which is why they don't mention it, to preserve their reputation and rating.

There is no bottle, you are admiring the emperor's new clothes.

Under what authority do you base that on? Don't say laws of physics please. radio waves is not energy all around us? Tesla was working on it until he died.

You are right it would not be an over-unity device as our understanding would have been raised a level or two. As we understand over-unity today it would be.

See through the Daily Mail tabloid tripe too. Despicable paper.

Maybe they know more than they are letting on.

I never said it was - but he a had a great inventive track record was ridiculed in other tests. Laithwaite went into giros and the likes, and was then ridiculed. he spend years putting his experiments in to the laws - probably frigged it to satisfy them.

He was speaking in general of our understanding of how matter, etc worked.

Then they give sound bites to the press.

You can't even see the emperor, at least I see him naked.

I refer to *your* line quoted a few lines above here "...something was happening in an experiment, outside the known laws of physics..."

How long before dribble invokes his plantpot comparison routine?

Right now.. what a plantpot!!!

I cannot see that happening :-)

Still at least 99.9% efficient though.

Adam

It can't, you pillock. Near 100% of the electricity is already converted into heat. If it saves on electricity it is getting energy from elsewhere.

No point in trying to educate dribble. He already believes boilers can be more than 100% efficient and argues thus - despite how this figure is arrived at being explained to him.

Certain 'laws' of physics have been overturned - the most famous which did this was perhaps the theory of relativity. But in practical terms it was splitting hairs. Not turning an efficiency of near 100% into 300% or whatever daft amount you've been conned by again.

Radio waves are produced by a transmitter which is powered by electricity. You could harness those for other purposes but would remove those waves from others use in that area. You'd also need an enormous aerial array. And the transmitting company would sue you for stealing their power and win - as has been done before. If you mean naturally occurring radio waves these are so small as to be useless to power anything.

Please eff off as you are a total idiot.

Please eff off as you are a total idiot.

Please eff off as you are a total idiot.

Please eff off as you are a total idiot.

An over unity device

Is that the latest euphemism?

Do you have the URL for that latest cut and paste so that we can read the rest of it?

In message , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes

... which is why I'm not getting drawn into this

Maxie, you are wise to ignore an idiot.