I think its fair.

Jul 13, 2008 2 Replies

formatting link
as Marks & Spencer charge more for large underwear By Ruki Sayid 12/07/2008



Busty shoppers were fuming yesterday after Marks & Spencer upped prices for bigger bras. The chain slapped £2 more on bra sizes from 30DD to 42G, saying they needed "more engineering and construction work". But campaign group Busts 4 Justice blasted the surcharge as "an affront to our fronts". Dubbing it a "mammary tax", founder Beckie Williams, 25, of Brighton, said: "They don't apply this policy to other clothes that use more material. "If you don't charge a size 20 woman more for trousers, why should you have to pay more for an E cup?" M&S said: "There are 30 different components in a bra. The extra charge is more to do with the engineering than material." It added the move was "standard practice". But John Lewis and Asda said they charged the same price for different sizes.



--------------------- I think its fair. I'm sure that owners of the more fullsome cup often benefit from lower quotes from tradesmen.


True or Flase?



Arthur


formatting link

There was a detailed article on the BBC News web site.

formatting link
found the referenced article to the Norfolk teenager who found a bat in hers somewhat interesting as well

formatting link

formatting link
> Anger

of it there is to see or undress. The bootlaces on my DeWalt boots could cover more than a birds knickers. And the laces do not cost £30.

Adam

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required