Gas regs Q

Apr 04, 2011 10 Replies

Had a new gas oven fitted in Jan. In order to accommodate it, we had a recommended (by the MiL) gas fitter put a bayonet fitting on the existing pipework which feeds the hob. He then fitted the new oven.



Fast forward to now, and with various problems (see post passim) the manufacturers decide to replace the oven. New oven delivered on Friday, and their service engineer turns up to fit it. He removes old oven, and then says he can't fit the new one as the gas point is not up to regs.



The gas point is about 10 cm to the left of the oven housing, and passes through the MDF of the fitted cabinet. His statement was both points are against current regs, and therefore he can't fit the new oven - although interestingly, he can happily leave the old one in place.



Personally, if it wasn't for the fact the oven needs to be fitted by the manufacturer, I'd have plugged it in myself.



Is the manufacturers engineer correct ?


I *think* if it is a stand alone cooker which can be wheeled out for cleaning, etc, a bayonet is ok. Built in ones - either hob or oven - should have a permanent connection.

I think the issue here is one of access rather than the type of connector (although I'd agree about the fixed connections).

My oven connector is behind a cabinet next to the oven but the rear panel is removable from inside the cabinet to allow access. Dunno if this is legal or not.

Tim

I thought that a hob could be connected with a flexible hose and bayonet fitting if the MI permit and if the hose is able to hang free (as YAPH has pointed out) and stay below 70C. But I could be wrong; and know that the gas fitter we had a quote from last year proposed to use rigid copper despite our wanting a hob with no oven underneath.

Yes, the bayonet (which is what is fitted to the oven) is in the next bay. There's a cutout in the cabinet side to allow it to pass through. The fitters words were "regs say it's not allowed to pass through wood

- it's a fire hazard". He said the pipework needed to be rerouted through the actual wall, to come out directly behind the oven.

He also mentioned something about a metal cap which new rags say should be plastic, so as to melt in the event of a fire. Unfortunately I wasn't actually there to see what he meant.

Are you sure that the right way round? Plastic melting in a fire and allowing uncontrolled escape of gas would be undesirable to say the least. I don't think he is as knowledgable as he thinks he is.

tbh that was my first thought ... however he's the guy sent by the manufacturer, so we need him to be happy to keep the manufacturer happy :-(

In message , Jethro writes

Whatever regulation he is quoting, was it current at the time the original installation was done? If yes yo have a claim against the original fitter, if no then the next question is are the new regulations retrospective?

The bayonet outlet has to be accessible by removing the oven /and/ /nothing/ /else/, ie in the bay behind the oven itself. Picture YAPH's artwork viewed from above:

WALL ________________________________ | bayonet | | + | | |----| | | +-----------+| | | || CUPBOARD| | ||CUPBOARD | | OVEN || | | || ________| |___________||_________

IANA gas plumber, but have just asked one.

JGH

Sounds bollocks to me. I can't think of a specific regulation that would apply to this. If the kitchen units are cut away so that the hose has plenty of free space to hang in and the bayonet can be accessed to connect/disconnect it then I don't see any more fire hazard than having the cooker installed in wooden kitchen units anyway.

Maybe ask the mfrs for clarification of what their installer is calling for?

At worst, you might need to make the hole bigger so there's no imaginable difficulty removing the hose.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required