Engineer beats traffic lights ...

formatting link

theregister.co.uk Traffic lights worldwide set to change after Swedish engineer saw red over getting a ticket

21 Oct 2019 at 11:03 5-6 minutes Mats Järlström's fight shows you never cross an engineer

Yellow traffic light

Exclusive A Swedish engineer's umbrage at a traffic ticket has led to a six-year legal fight and now a global change in the speed with which traffic light signals are timed.

After Mats Järlström lost an initial legal challenge in 2014, a federal judge in January this year ruled Oregon's rules prohibiting people from representing themselves as engineers without a professional license from the state are unconstitutional.

And now Järlström's calculations and advocacy have led the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) to revisit its guidelines [PDF] for the timing of traffic signals. As a result, yellow lights around the globe could burn for longer ? ITE is an international advisory group with members in 90 countries.

Järlström discovered a problem with the timing of traffic lights in Beaverton, Oregon, after his wife Laurie received a $260 ticket for a red light violation from an automated traffic light camera in 2013.

Järlström, who studied electrical engineering in Sweden, challenged the ticket, arguing the timing interval for yellow lights fails to account for scenarios like a driver entering an intersection and slowing to make a turn. A slightly longer interval, he argued, would allow drivers making turns on a yellow light to exit intersections before the light turned red. Even a small timing increase would help ? the automatically generated ticket in this case was issued 0.12 seconds after the light turned red.

When Järlström brought the issue to the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying, the state board opened an investigation in 2015 and fined him $500 the following year for practicing engineering without a professional license.

Thanks to the assistance of the Institute for Justice, a legal advocacy organization focused on limiting the scope of government, Järlström has won not only the right to refer to himself as an engineer, a refund of the surveying board fine (though not the ticket penalty), and the removal of the moving violation from his car insurance premium, but also the opportunity to fix a formula that has governed traffic light timing since

1960.

Since the injunction prohibiting Oregon from enforcing its unconstitutional speech restriction, Järlström has been working with other engineers and advocates to change the way traffic lights work. Over the summer, an ITE panel met to hear arguments along those lines and last month it agreed light timing should be reconsidered.

Mats Järlström's equation

"The yellow traffic signal was first conceived in 1920 and in 1960, scientists [Denos] Gazis, [Robert] Herman, and [Alexei] Maradudin presented the foundational science still in use today," Järlström said in an email to The Register. "It is a historic moment to now update the science by extending the 1960 solution to also be applicable to turning maneuvers."

Järlström said if the ITE accepts his solution, the duration of a yellow light in the right-turn scenario he described in 2015 would be extended from 3.2 seconds to 4.5 seconds using current input values ? driver- vehicle perception-reaction time and maximum safe, comfortable deceleration. Such timing may vary depending on other considerations, but in general the adoption of Järlström's formula should result in slightly longer yellow lights.

The ITE staff will develop and formalize the proposed changes to produce a final document called the Recommended Practice that will be submitted to the ITE Board of Directors for final approval in early 2020.

Jarlstrom said it has been a long process to reach this point. In addition to his own efforts, he credited the support of Alexei Maradudin, Jay Beeber, Brian Ceccarelli and the National Motorist Association?s Joe Bahen. He also said test equipment made by UK-based Racelogic provided a way to prove his theories.

"Our common goal is to improve traffic safety and fairness through our signalized intersections worldwide," said Järlström.

In a way, history is repeating itself. The initial 1960 light timing work came about because one of the scientists involved believed he'd been wrongly ticketed. In email correspondence with Järlström, Maradudin explained that he became a co-author of the 1960 paper because another co- author, Robert Herman, invited him to spend time at the General Motors Technical Center to work on traffic light math. Herman did so, Maradudin said, because he had received a red light ticket that he felt was unfair. ®

Reply to
Jethro_uk
Loading thread data ...

Of course, modern dynamic traffic light systems don't use fixed timing. They use traffic sensors buried in the road to work out where traffic is and how fast it is moving. They then change the lights to suit the traffic flow.

Reply to
nightjar

I think you've misunderstood the change that the guy has initiated

tim

Reply to
tim...

I?m well aware that traffic light change frequency can be affected by traffic but I?ve never noticed the speed of the ?green/yellow/red? sequence varying at all (which is the issue in this story). That seems to be preset and fixed.

Tim

Reply to
Tim+

Does this apply world wide I wonder. I suspect some countries do as they like. One of the current annoyances is the introduction of countdown crossings where a blind person is at a disadvantage as he/she will not be able to see the time limit ticking away. Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

Brian Gaff used his keyboard to write :

Maybe solvable with a tick/tock noise, becoming more rapid the nearer to the time limit it gets?

Reply to
Harry Bloomfield, Esq.

Already used on many continental pedestrian crossings. Pretty sure I?ve heard them in Amsterdam,

Tim

Reply to
Tim+

Like the old self timers on cameras wher eit speedsa up during the last 2 seconds of a 10 second count down. Come to think of it just like the countdown timer.

Reply to
whisky-dave

If he has then having 4.5 seconds for an amber is going to..

add to congestion

cause more amber gamblers

kill more people.

He obviously isn't fit to be an engineer trading lives against him getting a fine.

Its the camera use that needs fixing not the traffic lights so he has just cocked it up for everyone.

Reply to
invalid

Its not fixed. Wider junctions have longer ambers and a bigger overlap between red and green the other way.

Reply to
invalid

What's the issue? The beeping and the rotating thing will still be working. The countdown is so people know how long they have to wait to cross the road so they don't dash across. Blind people aren't going to dash over anyway.

Reply to
invalid

nothing to solve.

Reply to
invalid

?Fixed for any one junction?.

Tim

Reply to
Tim+

No it's the time left to cross safely while the stop lights are still showing for the traffic.

Yes it would be rather silly.

Reply to
whisky-dave

I don't even think thats true. Some junctions have sensors that detect the presence of vehicles and/or pedestrians and change the timing as required.

You can see this quite often when some pillock over shoots the line at pedestrian crossings and it stays on red for a long time because it thinks someone is still crossing due to the heat from the cars bonnet looking like a person to the sensors.

Reply to
invalid

No its not, the lights like that have sensors and won't change until the pedestrians are clear. Usually!

Reply to
invalid

I've seen car sensors get very confused by a car that has overshot the line. When I used to live there was a very long bridge over the Thames (several bridges over different streams of the river -

formatting link
*) with single-alternate-line working. The bridge was on a bend so one side could not see the other side. There was a very long delay between the lights going red in one direction and going green for the other direction, to allow for slow vehicles such as cyclists. Mind you, the timing was very pessimistic: on my bicycle I once passed the lights just as they turned amber and when I passed the other lights they were still red, and remained so until I was out of sight of them several hundred yards away.

I got used to long waits there. One day I was behind a learner driver who set off when the lights turned green and then stalled and couldn't get going. The lights remained red for a very long time without anything coming the other way, so they were probably in a fail-safe mode. Eventually it dawned on the instructor to get the learner to reverse: I'd already reversed to make way for her in expectation of her doing it. And as soon as the car was the correct side of the lights, normal service was resumed.

One thing was interesting. Late at night those lights seemed to enter a state where *both* directions got a red light, and then one side turned green after a car had arrived and been stationary for 30 seconds. It would have been better if the lights had remained permanently at green in the direction of the last car that passed, so that at least one direction would have had a clear run, even if the other direction still needed to go through a "prove that space between lights is clear of cars" cycle.

Occasionally the lights failed in the off state, so things reverted to a free-for-all with both directions going cautiously and having to mount the kerb if they met an oncoming HGV. Despite this, traffic seemed to flow better (queues were shorter) than when the lights were behaving normally. Safety versus throughput!

(*) In

formatting link
the lights are in the far distance. Turn the view left to see how long the queue was: I can count 23 cars in the queue and another two in the distance about to join. Probably not all them would get through on one cycle of the lights. Painful in the morning when there was a lot of traffic coming from south-east Oxford towards all the offices on Milton Park estate.

Reply to
NY

Having seen pedestrian lights in Norway and Denmark (Oslo and Copenhagen city centres) which have timers, I can confirm that the counters only display the digits when the pedestrian lights turn green, and count down the elapsed time until they will turn red again for pedestrians.

I hadn't realised that some pedestrian lights actually had people-sensors (body heat?) to check when the crossing was clear, in the same way that cars are detected by radar or induction loop. I presume those are used as a final safety check - once the counter has reached zero, the crossing *should* be clear of pedestrians, but the people-sensor acts as an override to the timer, for the benefit of slow walkers or partly sighted who won't have seen that the counter is approaching zero so they shouldn't start crossing unless they can make it to the other side in the remaining time.

Reply to
NY

Quite a lot have them around here, some have detectors so they can detect people standing there to cross.

You can see them at the tops of the poles facing in many directions, not to be confused with the "hidden" cameras on some of them or the "GSM" pod used for fault reporting of which there is usually only one.

Reply to
invalid

Not where I cross in stratford around 3 times a week. https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5418022,-0.0017597,3a,75y,140.97h,91.38t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPm40kzvIHnsf-zG_2xHuQQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 The sensors DO NOT detect pedstrians they detect metal structures i.e. traffic going over the road.

Reply to
whisky-dave

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.