best proper news client? recommendations sought

Another question - what news client are the sensible people using nowadays? Is there one that

  • doesn't put your domain name in the Message-ID (in fact, which maybe lets you choose the Message-ID),

  • threads posts properly,

  • makes it easy to let users post under a couple of different identities

  • doesn't cost anything

  • lets you add additional headers if you want, and

  • doesn't under any circumstances look like Microsoft Explorer, or otherwise treat you as if you're an idiot?

Turnpike 5 is great but falls down on the first item in the above list, and also puts in an X-Newsreader: header, which I wouldn't mind if it only identified the news client, but it includes a serial number.

Michael

Reply to
hanrahan398
Loading thread data ...

In article , snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.co.uk scribeth thus

Turnpike 5.02 is excellent :))..

Reply to
tony sayer

Oh, no! Now you've done it!

That's a bit like asking what's the best religion, only more contentious.

Reply to
Ron Lowe

I presume you mean on some version of MS Windows, and that you want a GUI client?

If *not* then I'd recommend slrn or tin.

A quick Google suggests that slrn is available for windows so, if you want/like a text mode newsreader then that's one possibility.

Reply to
tinnews

What, you want an actual *application*?

Surely the only true way is to telnet into the server on port 119 and do the protocol by hand.

That's the only way you have total control over it.

Reply to
Ron Lowe

Xananews, very configurable.

formatting link

Reply to
Paul - xxx

I use tin, even now I find it *much* better than any GUI client I have ever tried. It's semi-GUI anyway as it's mouse-aware so there's very little that a full GUI client can do that tin can't.

I can't speak for slrn on this front as I've not tried it in quite a few years now.

Reply to
tinnews

the one in my headers

-
Reply to
Mark

Time you looked at your own headers then ;-)

Reply to
Andy Burns

WHoooooosh

-
Reply to
Mark

So your reply was deliberately, rather than accidentally, unhelpful?

Reply to
Andy Burns

Not helpful.

Reply to
Bob Eager

Why would you want to do this?

I use Forte Agent. I can't claim it's the best because I haven't tried them all but it works for me.

Reply to
Mark

I use it as a way to identify spam sources.

A different identity for each newsgroup lets me check which addresses have been harvested.

Reply to
John Williamson

I just use an invalid address. It saves loads of hassle.

Reply to
Mark

An then what do you do?

I can't say it's ever been a big problem. I've been using an un-munged address with ES for ages and get very little spam.

I suspect most harvesters have given up looking at usenet.

Tim

Reply to
Tim Downie

Unfortuntaly not true. I recently had to give a real email address in order to be allowed to post to a news server. Within a couple of hours I started getting spam (mainly 419 scams).

Reply to
Mark

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.