Bending copper pipe to wide radius

*Right* is a concept which exists only in the minds of *people*. There are always different ideas of *right* held by different groups of people.

What OP is saying is follow my opinion of right.

--=20 Dave Fawthrop

17,000 free e-books at Project Gutenberg!
formatting link
Yorkshire Dialect go to
formatting link
Reply to
Dave Fawthrop
Loading thread data ...

Copper anneals at dull red heat and melts within the range of cherry red heat. Presuming that melting the tube is an undesirable result, the right method is set by physics and is not simply an opinion.

Colin Bignell

Reply to
nightjar

The ?laws? of science, including physics, are *only* an agreement by scientists in general that this is the best idea of reality we have at = the moment. Popper IIRC believes that all "Scientific laws" will be overturned or drastically modified within 200 years of formulation.

formatting link
>> A physical law, scientific law, or a law of nature is a scientific generalization based on empirical observations. They are conclusions or hypotheses which have been confirmed by repeated scientific experiments over many years, and which have become accepted universally within the scientific community.

Reply to
Dave Fawthrop

Are you really a contemptible pillock?

Reply to
Chris Bacon

Not sure I have any more info. I got it from an old book on using copper (which is also where I learned of filling with sand to bend pipes). There was a photograph of two young factory workers bending a pipe this way. Next time I'm over at my parents', I'll dig out the book and see if it says anymore. It's hardly suitable for 'd-i-y' pipe bending though;-)

Reply to
Andrew Gabriel

Which is utterly irrelevant. Deeper understanding of the physics of copper does not change the underlying physics of how it behaves when heated.

The mechanics of forming copper have not changed throughout human history - and what happens when you bend it and heat it is unlikely to change in the future.

New physical laws have to fit within existing observations, which means that it's very, very unlikely anyone will work out a different way to anneal copper using heat.

Many areas of physics have been explored with exquisitely sensitive instruments, and all the existing laws work down to those scales.

If you have a new theory, it is only useful if it conforms to all existing experiments - or it's patently false, or if it differs in some way from existing theory in some way that's testable.

Reply to
Ian Stirling

Many thanks for all the useful replies to my question. The sand & heat method did the trick...

Nigel Lord

Reply to
Nige

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.