A staggering indictment

May 24, 2024 Last reply: 2 years ago 90 Replies

He never ever had any arguments, just mindless hysterical hyperventilation.

Nope. There never was any rivers of blood when his mindless hysterical hyperventilation was ignored.

No one ever worshipped that useless parasite, not even Liz.

Ever actually read it?

It can be found online and had been published within a collection of his speeches when I was a student in the 1970s, when there were copies within the humanities library.

Search in vain for the string "Rivers of blood". It does not occur.

The line was "Like the Roman, I seem to see the River Tiber foaming with much blood", quoting Virgil (if inexactly).

Misquoting it (deliberately, I should say, in many instances), is the equivalent of insisting that Callaghan said "Crisis? What crisis?".

I wonder whether certain people understand the meaning of the word "worship".

"The River Tiber foaming with much blood" (the actual wording) wasn't real.

It was a *vision*... an omen of bad things to come... a bit like Calpurnia's vision of men washing their hands in Caesar's blood.

It was in fact mindless hysterical hyperventilation

No one has ever seen anything like that in the whole of human history, so it was nothing like that either.

Nothing even remotely like that.

<sigh>

Exactly like that.

It was a quote from Virgil.

Heavy breathing aint gunna save your bacon.

Pathetic.

Nothing even remotely like Powell's mindless hysterical hyperventilation

Yes.

That's where I found it.

Indeed, it was what the speech was called colloquially.

Easy to see how it became known as the "Rivers of Blood" speech then.

I neither quoted nor misquoted it.

Am 26/05/2024 um 10:18 schrieb R Souls:

Lots of people still worship Liz Truss!

Is it easy to see the transformation from a quotation of Virgil into something quite different?

Perhaps you could explain the thinking here, which to be generous could be described as ‘woolly’?

Virgil was a bloody foreigner! What is this country up to? Quoting foreigners?

F*ck, I had to learn Virgil at secondary school and I hated him.

Yes, if there was a massive reason to demonise and cancel Enoch. To replace what was a heartfelt misgiving, with a 'hysterical racist rant' in the minds of people.

People, then as now, were making money out of immigration.

Today we see the importation of cultures and the worldwide spread of cultures who are not interested in integration. Only domination.

It's worse now than then.

Joe snipped-for-privacy@jretrading.com wrote

Fact.

Just because some f****it journo claims something...

What makes you say it is quite different, look at the words.

It's self evident.

Anyone using the description "rivers of blood speech" is misquoting it.

Many of them quite deliberately.

‘The Tiber’ (named, singular) does not equate to ‘rivers’ (unnamed, plural). ‘Foaming with much blood’ does not equate to either ‘the Tiber’ or ‘rivers’ of blood.

It’s a reductio ad abdurdum.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required