Why don't you quote what Mulally actually said in that testimony to Congress that was pertinent to the discussion:
"On Tuesday, Ford Motor Company submitted to your Committee our comprehensive business plan, which details the company=92s path to profitability through an acceleration of our aggressive restructuring actions and the introduction of more high-quality, safe and fuel-efficient vehicles =96 including a broader range of hybrid-electric vehicles and the introduction of advanced plug-in hybrids and full electric vehicles. In addition to our plan, we are also here today to request support for the industry. In the near-term, Ford does not require access to a government bridge loan. However, we request a credit line of $9 billion as a critical backstop or safeguard against worsening conditions as we drive transformational change in our company."
And in the end, they didn't need even the the credit line. I think Ford deserves credit, not condemnation for being the only one of the big 3 that got through this without a federal bailout.
As for the claim that Ford didn't take govt money because people were watching, obviously that is specious because it didn't stop GM, Chrysler, Wall Street, the banks, etc.