Why would a DECT Panasonic cordless phone keep losing the wireless link?

This is very useful information, an applicable to the WiFi group as well.

My DECT Panasonic KX-TG6441 phones & handsets apparently operate at

1.9 GHz, according to page 6 of this PDF:
formatting link
"The product operates in the frequency range of 1.92 GHz to 1.93 GHz, and the RF transmission power is 115 mW (max.)"
Reply to
Danny D'Amico
Loading thread data ...

My problematic Panasonic KX-TG6441 cordless phone is also on 1.9 GHz, as described on page 6 of this PDF:

formatting link
formatting link

Reply to
Danny D'Amico

This is a good point!

Reply to
Danny D'Amico

This makes sense.

What I did today was I pulled the batteries out of the five handsets and pulled the power from the base, and let it sit that way all day.

formatting link

Then, I performed the re-registration procedure as outlined on p27 of this PDF:

formatting link

Here's just the Panasonic cordless phone re-registration procedure:

formatting link

Hopefully, re-registering all five handsets may help with the problem of the Panasonic KX-TG6441 dropping calls after a while:

formatting link

I'll let you know what happens...

Reply to
Danny D'Amico

This might actually be the problem!

After removing all the batteries and allowing the handsets and base to sit for about five hours today ...

formatting link

When I put the batteries back, I noticed that all five handsets said to "Charge for 7 Hours" ...

formatting link

So, I put them all on a 3.5 hour charger:

formatting link

And, when I put them back into the phone, they *still* said to charge for 7 hours!

formatting link

So, maybe it's that simple - that the Ni-MH batteries, which are a few years old, are bad.

One problem though, is that I put the new Ni-MH batteries that came with the charger in, after charging them on the charger, and the handsets *still* said to charge for 7 hours.

So, something fishy is going on ... with the charge message on the handsets ... but I don't know what yet.

Reply to
Danny D'Amico

They're on 1.9 GHz ...

formatting link

Reply to
Danny D'Amico

That's a great suggestion Jeff.

Maybe these other DECT phones in the same house:

formatting link
Are causing the problem with this DECT phone:
formatting link

It might also be the batteries, although you can see in the previous photo that they are fully charged - yet - I charged them today off the Panasonic base:

formatting link

And, strangely, when I ran the registration procedure, they showed up as being discharged! ?????????

formatting link

So that makes absolutely no sense. I chalk it up to "confused electronics" at this point - because I can't imagine what happened to make a fully charged battery indicate almost discharged.

Anyway, as a precaution, I ran the re-registration procedure, which is described on page 27 of this PDF:

formatting link

This is a snapshot of the re-registration procedure:

formatting link

Since the menus don't show up until *after* you run the procedure, I post below sequential screenshots so others who run the registration procedure can see the cause and effect on the phones:

Press LOCATOR on base 4 sec. Then press OK.

formatting link
Call from Base:
formatting link
Base regtr'ing
formatting link

Reply to
Danny D'Amico

Since about zero percent of people are gonna do that, they might have concluded that a timer inside the device would determine that the device had charged all it could and the display was in terms of "do this" instead of any actual measurement, and be adequate to direct 99.9999% of users to perform the operation.

Some people are "overthinkers" ;-) Hmmm...I resemble that remark.

Reply to
mike

That might be the case Mike, because I know two things.

The batteries were showing fully charged initially:

formatting link

Then, I removed them and let the phone sit for a few hours:

formatting link

When I then ran my first re-registration procedure, I was surprised to see that all five phones suddenly showed low battery indications:

formatting link

That made no sense because pulling the batteries and letting them sit disconnected for a few hours couldn't possibly have discharged them from full to near zero. But it was easy enough to charge them independently on a Ni-MH charger:

formatting link

Yet, I was again very surprised to see, after 3.5 hours on the charger (the lights stop blinking on the charger to indicate full charge) that, back in the handsets, they *still* said they were low on charge!

formatting link

Something doesn't add up - but all five handsets acted the same way, even with the four new batteries from the charger put into two of the handsets.

All five phones are now in their respective holders, and, I just checked the charge, and they went from one bar to three bars, so, that's just weird.

It's almost as if they'll only charge from their Panasonic holders, and not from a separate non-Panasonic charger. But, that makes no sense - so - I really don't know what to make of this inconsistent data other than to ignore it.

Reply to
Danny D'Amico

Don't you have a voltmeter? You shouldn't be depending on the base to inform you as to whether the batteries are actually being fully recharged.

Reply to
William Sommerwerck

Ummm... was the phone designed to use NiMH or NiCd batteries? I'm too lazy to check.

NiMH batteries can be a problem due to high self discharge and possible overcharging. I suggest that you charge a few of the batteries in the phones for a day and then remove the batteries. Measure the voltage which should be about 1.2V when fully charged. Just let them sit outside the handset for at least 12 hrs (or more). Then measure the voltage again. 1.1V to 1.2V is fairly normal. 1.0V is borderline. Anything less than 1.0V is a problem. What you're measuring is the self-discharge rate, which tends to get worse as the batteries get older. It's particularly bad with NiMH which can lose

1% to 5% per day depending on temperature and age.

Besides dubious batteries, I'm beginning to suspect you may have multiple problems. Two independent but incompatible DECT systems, on the same frequency, are going to cause mutual interference. The reason the problem is intermittent is that both bases have be on the same channel in order to cause mutual interference. With 5 (US) channels to use, you're chances are 1 in 5 of having a collision. Unplug one base and see if the probleem goes away.

Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

Part of the DECT standard is that a device listens before it transmits. If the channel is in use, it changes the channel. What happens when all channels are busy I have no idea.

What you describe was the problem with the old 2.4gHz cordless phones. They just picked a channel and transmitted on it. The later ones were spread spectrum, so as far as WiFi was concerned, it interfered on ALL of channels.

Or in plain English, when my upstairs neighbor's phone rang, my WiFi crashed.

DCT phones work the same way as DECT phones, but on the 2.4gHz or 5.8gHz band. Again, what they do when all channels are busy I do not know.

This is also why cell phones do not need to be licensed. They only transmit when asked to by a cell, which in most places is licensed.

If for example, you were to bring a 1900mHz GSM phone to Europe, or a

900/1800mHz EU GSM phone to the US, it won't start transmitting and interfere with whatever is using those frequencies.

Geoff.

Reply to
Geoffrey S. Mendelson

I was remiss in not mentioning that I tested the voltage with my fluke but the problem, as always, with testing open circuit no-load voltage is that without a load, a battery that tests good isn't necessarily good.

However, all the handsets are now reading full bars in battery voltage, so, I'm inclined to assume that the battery-charge indicator on the handsets isn't really a voltage indicator - but some sort of integrator.

The good news is that it hasn't happened since re-registration; but I also haven't been on the phone a lot either. I will report back in a few days to let you know if the problem is solved by the re-registration or not.

Reply to
Danny D'Amico

Hi Jeff, The batteries are the original, and, they're all Ni-MH batteries. I noticed a set (white paint) was of a different amperage, so, I reassembled all the sets with like-amperage batteries (to prevent reverse voltage situations).

I ran that from yesterday, Jeff, and they came back at 1.2 volts. So, I must tentatively conclude that the phone itself has a summative charging icon, where it might be "timed" in the charger, rather than checked at the battery.

All five handsets, with the same batteries that read nearly dead after charging, now read full. I haven't extensively tested yet, but, all seems well now (tentative assessment).

This might be the reason for the intermittence!

What I *should* do is buy a DECT system with 9 handsets instead of two DECT systems for a total of 9 handsets.

Reply to
Danny D'Amico

Cheap garbage?

Reply to
Daring Dufas: Hypocrite TeaBil

I don't believe it. The phones look at least 8 years old. If the NiMH batteries were that old and left on continuous charge, they should be nearly dead by now. I have a discharge tester (West Mtn Radio CBA-II) that can test them. Send me one cell and I'll run a test (time permitting).

Ok, the batteries are not totally dead.

Dunno. I've used a few Panasonic handsets around the house. The one with individual cells ate batteries about every 3-5 years.

Offhand, I would say a bad battery or charger connection. The chrome plated connections on both the handset and charger base don't make a reliable connection and must be cleaned carefully. Same with the internal battery contacts.

Just buying some additional handsets for your existing base might be a better and cheaper idea. The data sheets list the maximum number of handsets a base will accomodate. I know of one system with 12 handsets. This might help: Oops. Looks like Panasonic is limited to 6 handsets.

Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

Hi Jeff, The phones *are* old. I agree.

And, those yellow Ni-MH AAA batteries are the originals. So, I must have done the voltage test wrong.

Let me explain what I did, so we can see what I did wrong.

  1. Here are four of the handsets, with full battery indicators:
    formatting link

  1. Flipping them over, only two currently have original batteries:
    formatting link

  2. Opening one, I find the battery open-circuit voltage is 1.4VDC:
    formatting link

  1. Likewise, the other battery is 1.4VDC, with no load on it:
    formatting link

  2. Yet, putting them back, the phone now indicates a low battery:
    formatting link

Conclusion? A freshly charged battery (hot off the phone cradle), reads good; but the phone charge indicator reads full at first, and then almost empty after merely removing and then replacing the batteries.

  1. Similar voltages were found for the other handset batteries:
    formatting link
    formatting link

  1. The replacement batteries read slightly higher voltages:
    formatting link

  2. Yet, all read low when immediately put back in the handset:
    formatting link

I'm not sure what to make of this data ...

Reply to
Danny D'Amico

[...]

Been there, done that, should have posted sooner. These/some Panasonic cordless handsets display a "Charge for 7 hours" message (and a single bar on the battery gauge) whenever batteries are installed, regardless of the state-of-charge.

Details:

Last spring I attempted to set up a used KX-TG9341S system and got this message on all of the handsets. Old batteries, new batteries, Panasonic batteries, externally charged batteries, didn't matter (other than alkaline cells, which it detected: "Wrong battery type"). Measured voltages, currents, took apart a handset to look for damaged components, double checked that full battery voltage was actually getting to the PCB. Googled it, read a bunch of head-scratching, generic battery advice, and speculation. Got frustrated and moved on to other projects.

A few months later I saw some of the Panasonic NiMH cells at the local recycling center and decided to take another run at it. I charged (externally) all of the cells and tested them. Then I got another idea

- I don't normally use AAA NiMH cells, but use lots of AA cells, so jumpered over a pair of known-good, freshly charged AA cells to the battery terminals of one of the handsets. Still got the 7 hour message. That seals it - it's not the batteries. I picked the best six Panasonic cells, let the handsets go through their 7 hour charge cycle, and have been using the system ever since.

Panasonic apparently decided to override the charge sense/termination circuitry with the 7 hour timer when batteries are installed in order to reduce product returns (from customers who neglect to read the fine manual and discover that their brand-new handsets and batteries don't work right away). I did find some weak cells over time, but that's unrelated to the 7 hour message.

Recommendations:

  1. If you put charged cells into the handset, ignore the message and leave the handset out of the charger for a few days (while using it, of course). Otherwise, the batteries will be overcharged by the forced
7-hour 'initial' charge.

  1. Test for good cells in the handset by trying the speaker phone option. A weak cell will result in a power cycle (no audio, blank display, then display with no backlight). If both cells are weak, it will power cycle when the backlight comes on (i.e. whenever a button is pressed). Check the cells under load with a meter to determine if one cell has dropped out, or they are both at low charge. Keep pairs of cells matched wrt state-of-charge.

  2. Look elsewhere for the solution to your link issue.

Good Luck, Tony Matt

Reply to
Tony Matt

Hmmm, Maybe I am dumb or simple minded. Manual says charge 7 hours B4 using. I just left it over night out of box. Ever since they all have been reliably working. At home and at the store.

Reply to
Tony Hwang

If the power to the master is disrupted while the remotes are not on charge it is possible for the remote to loose connection to the base on SOME Panasonic phones. Mine are KXT5433 5.8ghz units and it has happened to me. Don't know about DECT

Reply to
clare

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.