Is the antenna 40-ft high from the ground or roof top? How do you get up
to it? With an antenna that high you want to do it right the first time.
I strongly suggest getting a new antenna with a good UHF front-end and a
rotator to fine tune the aiming. An antenna amplifier would be a good
investment too. I would use coax because it's stronger and more durable
than twinlead. This will minimize the possibility of a broken downlead,
requiring you to go back up to the antenna.
Be very careful with this project. Have a helper close by and look out
for power lines that might come in contact with the antenna and mast.
In that particular area, you have to be very careful using an antenna
amplifier, especially if you are talking about a pre-amp mounted at the
antenna. Only a professional will know which amp will work in that
area. Some of the Sacramento signals are so strong on UHF that the
pre-amp can do more harm than good. Remember, doubling a weak signal
will help, but also doubling that very strong signal can put that
signal all over the dial. I had a pre-amp in a large directional
antenna in Sacramento and had to have it removed. I couldn't get ANY
distant channel as all the locals wiped them out. Using a weak amp
MIGHT help in this case. You CAN NOT improve the signal-to-noise ratio
at the antenna. What you hope to achieve is to keep as much of that
signal as possible. In other words, to reduce the lead losses. But
ALL pre-amps/amps introduce some noise. You can't get a better signal
that what you are getting at the antenna, no matter what you do.
You might check with dealers in your area. But I have an idea that if
you replaced your lead to just ONE coax cable from antenna to tv, you'd
see a major improvement in reception from San Francisco and/or Modesto.
On 10 Feb 2006 09:58:17 -0800, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
All I have is a RS amplified antenna in the attic -- the amplifer is
in the antenna -- and I love it because I'm in Baltimore and I can get
all the DC stations**. Rarely but sometimes, the signal is too strong
with Baltimore stations, so I have an A-B swtich that disconnects the
entire antenna if I want. Then I just use the one foot piece of co-ax
from the VCR to the A-B swtich, and even that little signal is more
than enough when I'm tuned to any station that overloads when using
the amplified antenna.
I suppose I could have gotten a variable reducer, or an amp with
variable amplification, and sought the best compromise value, but this
was simpler, and lets me use maximum for the DC stations. For
example, for a few months channel 9 was weak. Then it got to be fine
and about the same time channel 7 got weak. Now they're both fine,
but I want to keep amplification at its max for the hardware I bought.
**BTW, this is better than cable because cable doesn't have DC
stations. Often there is a sports game or even a non-sports show on
tv in Baltimore while DC is carrying the regular weekly show.
Also, once when I was watching Law and Order on two tv's at the same
time (fiddling with one of them) I saw that the last minute of the
show, the part after the last commercial, was shown on the DC channel,
but on the Baltimore channel, they put in another commercial. Very
distressing. The earlier part of the show they had been totally
synchronized. Channel 11 in Baltimore basically cheated everyone out
of that last minute or 30 seconds, which resolved some of the plot
issues. Now I watch channel 4 in DC more often.
Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let
me know if you have posted also.
If you want a really detailed list, www.fcc.gov has database search
pages for various services. I can't remember the exact URL, but
go to the FCC site, then the pages for the "Media Bureau" and then
there'll be links to television and other broadcast databases.
When you find the query page, you feed it your latitude and longitude
in Degrees/Minutes/Seconds and feed it a radius distance in miles
(or kilometers?) and it will come back with a list of every TV station
(analog an digital), repeater, and station under construction, with a
distance and degree heading.
Mark Zenier email@example.com
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)
You can't expect good reception by mixing the two kinds of cable.
Use one or the other. Coax is preferred. You get less ghosts with
coax, and most likely better signal. Depending on your directions, an
antenna rotor may benefit you. That way you can point it toward
SanFrancisco or your local towers.
BTW: Coax is easier to install. You dont need all those standoffs and
Coiling up extra coax wil not make it like a RF choke and will not lower the
signal level. As long as the coil diameter is large enough that the center
conductor does not cut into the iner insulation and short to the shield,
nothing on the outside of the coax will affect the strength of the signal.
The signal is carried on the inside of the outer shield. Coil up all the
extra you want. One thing that will affect the signal is if you have way
too much coiled up (like 20 or more feet) is the extra loss in the length of
coax. YOu will get the same ammount of loss if it is coiled or just ran in
If you are transmitting , coiling up the coax may have a benifit as it will
act as a choke and keep the transmitted rf that is coupled from the antenna
from getting back to the transmitter. Discussion on this is beyond the TV
application and not needed here.
You sound like you know what you're talking about, but one thing gets
me. Here you say it will act as a choke and at the start of the
previous paragraph you say it won't. Why does transmission have a
different result from reception, or is there some other difference?
Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let
me know if you have posted also.
I have been a ham radio operator for over 30 years and at one time held a
first class phone license that was good for the comercial radio repair.
When receiving the signal comes from the antenna it comes down on the
outside of the inner wire and the inside of the outer sheild. Unlike
Direct current which uses all the wire area, as the frequency goes up, the
signal only uses part of the area. That is a copper tube can carry just as
much signal as a solid wire the same diameter. Large coax (usually called
hardline) is often made this way. There is nothing useful on the outside of
the shield of the coax. In otherwords everything from the receiving
antenna is on the inside of the coax and coiling it up has no effect .
When transmiting it is possiable that some of the signal from the antenna
will couple or be introduced on the outside of the coax. This unwanted
signal will come back down the coax on the outside of the shield and can
cause problems with the transmitter and other electronics in the house. If
the coax is wound in a coil it may choke off this unwanted signal. The coil
is usually placed outside the house .
You seem to know a lot. Here's a question, if my mast is well grounded
(buried a few feet) do I still need to ground the coax before it enters
the house? The way I see it, the mast will dissipate any charge on the
Not sure who you are addressing, but the shield of the coax does need to
be grounded before entering the house. This is regardless of whether the
antenna mast is grounded, but it should be. I would run a copper ground
wire, at least 12-gauge, from a clamp on the antenna mast to a good
copper clad ground rod. Connect the shield of the coax to this ground
wire too. You can use a coax grounding 'block' to make the shield
connection to the ground wire. This block is the kind that cable TV
companies use to ground their coax before it enters the house. You can
buy one at Radio Shack or hardware stores with coax parts.
I try not to give advice on lightning protection. For about 25 years I had
a tower up about 40 feet and never took a hit of any kind. The tower was
not very well grounded and there were about 6 coax cables from various ham
antennas coming into the radio room. None were grounded . There was also a
wire about 130 feet long split in the middle and coax comming into the radio
room. It was up about 30 feet and not grounded in any way. Only damage I
ever took was a couple of telephones over the phone line. The installation
was done by the phone company and I never looked at it to see how well it
was done. Others I have know had well grounded systems and still had their
equipment wiped out by lightning.
When moisture gets into flat cable (300-ohm twinlead) it degrades the
signal. If the insulation is cracked and the wires are exposed, it
should be replaced all the way to the antenna. Don't use cheap twinlead.
The good kind has foam insulaton under the plastic outer insulation.
Connect the new twinlead just like the old one at the antenna. Clean the
antenna terminals with some electrical cleaner spray and a plastic scrub
pad. It might be better to replace the terminal screws, nuts and washers
with new ones made of brass or stainless steel. This may require cutting
and/or drilling the old screws off. They usually get corroded on an old
Currently I just have it directly wired to
If you decide to continue using twinlead to the antenna, you should
install an impedance matching transformer where the twinlead connects to
the existing coax. (See next paragraph below.) Twinlead has less signal
loss than coax so it's preferred in reception areas where signal
strengths are low. This may not apply in your case. Coax has greater
signal loss than twinlead but better immunity to noise reception from
home appliances. This is a consideration when deciding which kind of
antenna lead wire to use. If coax is used all the way from the antenna
to the TV it might require an antenna amplifier to make up for the
signal loss in the coax. The amplifier is installed on the antenna mast.
The power supply for the amp' is located near the TV.
If you want to connect 75-ohm coax to a TV antenna which only has two
screw terminals for twinlead, you'll need an impedance matching
transformer. This is the kind which is used on the back of older TV's
that have antenna screw terminals instead of a female coax connector.
The matching transformer has a coax connector on one end and two wires
(pigtails) on the other. The pigtails would be attached to the two
terminals on the antenna and the coax goes to the female connector on
the matching transformer. You should use a transformer made for outdoor
use. You can buy one at Radio Shack or home improvement stores that have
a TV hardware department. The labeling will say that it's made for
connecting coax to a TV antenna which has screw terminals.
Matching transformers for TV use are not expensive, so it's not worth
the effort to make one. It's also not easy to make one that works well
at TV frequencies, especially UHF. Proper impedance matching between
antenna and lead wire is important for getting the best signal quality
to the TV.
While you are at it, you may wish to replace the antenna as well. If you do
be sure to get one with good UHF reception. Once the US switches to digital
TV, I believe in 2009, all TV signals will be in the UHF band.
I agree with everyone here that coax is better but so far noone has
mentioned there are two types of coax, 50 ohm and 75 ohm. Make sure
that you use the 75 ohm coax. 50 ohm is generally used for
communications and you can't tell the difference between the two by the
size or thickness of the coax. You can tell by the number stamped on
the coax, eg. RG75U, etc.
Yes, this is correct. Most hardware stores only carry the 75 ohm
RG75U these days. The 50 ohm was popular in the 70's and 80's during
the CB radio craze, but is seldom used these days except by amateur
radio people and the few that still use CB. In fact Radio Shack no
longer carries the 50 ohm cable in bulk. I wanted a piece for my
scanner and they only had pre-made cables, and not the lengths even
close to what I needed. I finally chopped a piece off an old CB
antenna and soldered on my own ends.
Geeezzzz, I'm having a brain fart.... Is that RG50U.... ????
Don't sound right.... The older I get the more my memory fades !!!
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.