I'm trying to score a cheap or free old laptop so I can watch Internet programs on TV. (I gave up cable; too expensive and too few channels that interest me. I tried OTA with an internal antenna & got a lot of stations, but what crap!
My Panasonic flatscreen TV is about 4 ? years old and has all those HDMI inputs.
So my question is: What do I require in a laptop that will do the job. Does it need to have the equivalent of the TV? Or...?
You'll pay a lot less for a compatible desktop than you would a laptop.
As for specs, it depends on how much resolution you want to watch your
shows with. I don't have any trouble with 720p using a circa 2006-ish
box using an AMD 64 socket 939 and an ATI x800 GPU (which has composite
From my understanding, you won't gain any better picture with HDMI than
you would composite connections, you just need to find a video card that
outputs with composite (ATI has a number of models with this feature;
the connector is a dongle that plugs into a port on the back of the
video card that "looks like" an S-video port, but is their own version
of a multi-port that has composite and component in and out).
Don't forget to get a cable to connect the soundcard (1/8" stereo) to
the TV (RCA).
Alternately, they have USB to HDMI dongles, but that's too fancy for me.
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 7:26:13 PM UTC-7, Jon Danniken wrote:
I see I left out some necessary info:
1. My desktop is in another room from TV. I did price cables & connectors from desktop to TV. Need several cables spliced to bridge length, plus some connectors. Got so expensive -- plus the danger of cables dragging all over
the floor -- that I ruled out this option.
2. With my eyesight, I want the best resolution I can get. Surprised that you said HDMI no better than VGA! Any countervailing opinions? Any technically established facts?
3. Don't understand about video card. Does it go in laptop or TV? Sorry; this whole caper is new to me.
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 11:54:29 PM UTC-4, Higgs Boson wrote:
You can buy cables to pretty much any reasonable length. Long HDMI
cables are available on Ebay for a reasonable price, for example.
You'll go broke if you buy them at Walmart and try to join them
Unless you have improving eyesight, I think you have that backwards.
Poorer vision, higher resolution isn't going to make as much difference
as it will if you have perfect+ vision.
The video card is in the PC. Depends what you want to do and what
form factor you want. You could get a notebook or use a desktop.
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:08:01 AM UTC-4, Higgs Boson wrote:
The higher the resolution, the more detail that is maintained. So, you have it
right. That assumes that the resolution is maintained, ie if you take
a high resolution source, eg blueray and display it on a low resolution TV,
you're not going to see it. It also makes more difference on a larger
display than a smaller one. Put a moderate resolution image on a 70"
display and it's going to look worse than it will on a 17"
Did you look at Chromecast and similar, as others have recommended?
I'm no expert, but that is the direction the world is moving, ie streaming
video directly to the TV either with an internet interface in the TV
or using a Chromecast or similar device. One advantage the notebook would
have is that it can also serve as a DVR, ie it can record video.
There are also many DVR solutions out there that have HD tuners plus
the ability to view internet content. That's a constantly changing area,
IDK which ones allow viewing what internet content, but I think it's
worth checking out.
When Dish and the local CBS affiliate decided to argue about fees, etc.,
we couldn't get our most watched network. All of the shows we watch
were available the next day on the CBS website. So, I streamed them to
may little Dell laptop, which has an HDMI port. It was a royal pain.
First, my 3 meg DSL could barely keep up. I found that it worked a
little better with a wired network connection rather than wifi. Second,
every time it would freeze, you'd have to get up and restart the stream.
Luckily, it would pick up close to where it froze. Sometimes it would
run good for an hours show, sometimes it would freeze multiple times. I
found completely dropping the connection and starting over seemed to
help. Third, you have to watch their commercials. And because there
seems to be a rather low number of commercials, you see the same one
over and over and over ... you get it. I know there are ways to record
a show and skip the commercials (a PC based DVR), but who would have
thought CBS would be dark for almost 5 weeks. This Dell laptop processor
is only 1.2Gig, so that might be a part of it. Streaming to my desktop,
with more horsepower, was much better. With this same 3 Meg DSL, I can
stream baseball games to the TV directly, but it is herky-jerky. The TV
app for MLB.com doesn't have any way to reduce the resolution. Now with
MLB.com to the same laptop or tablet, it is a little reduced in
resolution and it works pretty good. I can then plug the laptop or
tablet into the TV (HDMI) and get ok results. The laptop app for MLB
has some auto speed thing. I think the tablet is similar. BTW, I think
the Dish/local affiliate standoff is most the local affiliate's want to
grab as much $$$ as possible. If Dish or any cable company, just gives
in and pays, our cable/satellite bills would go up rapidly once they pay
on provider ... they'll all want it even though we still have to watch
the commercials. And maybe they see the fact that eventually everything
will probably be streamed. Sorry for being so long winded.
OK, I just read that you have a router.
I don't know what kind of desktop you have, what operating system or
internet speed, but If you can watch streaming video on your desktop w/o
any problems you can buy a USB wifi adapter and a Chromecast dongle then
you can stream video from your desktop to your TV.
You will have to get the router up and working, then get a connection
from the router to the wifi adapter and then follow the instructions for
Composite out put? That's analog signal with poor resolution. And audio?
just analog 2 channel? Even on 2 channel, digital audio carried by HDMI
cable sounds better(say Dolby for example?) HDMI one cable vs.
3 caables carry inferior video/audio......
Component is still analog signal plus you have to match it with TOS link
or digital coax audio cable 3 wire cumbersome video cable with one
more either digital audio cable. HDMI is for simplicity! Now it'll carry
Ethernet signal and USB signal altogether pretty soon. If you don't like
HDMI, blame Sony who brought about HDMI.
The Roku devices or maybe the Chrome would be worth checking out. I have
one of the Big Roku devices and there is lots to get. Also for less than $
10 per month you can get access to some regular TV such as HULU Plus.
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
On Sun, 6 Apr 2014 18:30:45 -0700 (PDT), Higgs Boson
Does your TV have the 15 pin VGA port? Most flat screens to.
Just about any PC will work, certainly anything XP or later.
I have had a PC hooked to my TV for almost 15 years, first just for
the MP3s and then later for video content as that started coming on
line. It does not have to be a lap top.
On 4/7/2014 4:12 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
No, they don't.
Between myself and my family members we have 11 flat screen TVs and only
one of them has a VGA input...a 32" Westinghouse that is about 7 years
old. Hell, it's hard to find a new flat screen that even has a separate
set of component and composite inputs now. Manufacturers are starting to
use component/composite hybrid inputs.
On Sun, 6 Apr 2014 20:54:29 -0700 (PDT), Higgs Boson
You can just get another desk top style PC for way less that $100
these days. Get the small format system unit and it won't take up any
more room than a lap top.
Get the blue tooth adapter and you can use a small keyboard/mouse that
will work up to 30 feet away. The TV is the monitor
| I'm trying to score a cheap or free old laptop so I can watch Internet
programs on TV. (I gave up cable; too expensive and too few channels that
interest me. I tried OTA with an internal antenna & got a lot of stations,
but what crap!
I don't have any advice about hardware details,
but I would suggest that you find a way to check
out your *real* options before spending the money. I
get Netflix DVDs by mail. At one point I had a chance
to see the Netflix streaming service via Roku. I
didn't recognize anything in the first window! When
I tried some searches it turned out the things I
was interested in were not available. It's an all-you-
can-eat buffet, so you don't get salmon filets or
By contrast, this past week I saw the following
movies via DVD:
* The Great Beauty (Best foreign film Oscar 2014. A
stunningly good movie.)
* The Past (another impressive, recent release that
you won't see in the theater chains)
* Gravity (idiotic junk but nevertheless a recent hit movie)
I think we pay something like $13/month for the DVD
What I'm saying is that if you think what's available
via antenna is junk then you might not be terribly
impressed by online fare.
Another aspect I wonder about in the longterm is
the general logistics. As streaming becomes more popular,
something has to give somewhere. The ISPs are going
to want a piece of the action if entertainment streaming
begins to dwarf the actual Internet. I don't want to spend
time and money today only to find that all the prices go
way up 2 years down the road, and I end up with just
an overpriced alternative to overpriced cable TV.
The site you linked says so...
"Googles Chromecast is a small dongle that plugs into a spare HDMI port on
your TV to stream media from the internet to the living room screen using
your smartphone, tablet or computer as a remote."
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.