On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 6:18:55 AM UTC-4, dadiOH wrote:
Ummm, it doesn't appear to say that you need a laptop. It apparently
needs a "remote" to operate it and that can be a smartphone, tablet,
or computer. Which makes sense. I can use my smartphone to control
my Tivo for example.
I am still not sure why you folks say it is so wrong to hook an old
(dedicated) PC to your TV through the 15 pin connector virtually every
new TV has. Hook this up to your network. You can use it to stream
from virtually every streaming service out there but you can also use
it like a slide projector to look at pictures, you can play music, I
heart radio, and if you have a PiP TV you can even browse the web
while you are watching regular TV content in the other box.
One thing we like to do is have the MP3 player running for the sound
and put up a slide show or a video on the screen.
On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 2:49:41 PM UTC-4, dadiOH wrote:
It's not even saying that. The smartphone, PC, or tablet is just used
to *control* what happens on the TV. For example, with my Tivo, I
can use my smartphone and it's display to search for a Youtube video
or a Netflix movie. Having found it, I can then command that it be
played and it shows up on the TV by being streamed to the Tivo.
I wouldn't say the TV is functioning
as the monitor for my smartphone, any more than I'd say the TV is
functioning as a monitor for an ordinary remote. The TV is essentially
serving as a display for the chrome device.
If you're using a PC and it's video card to play media and then have
the TV connected to it, in that case I'd say the TV is functioning as a monitor,
because it's connected to and displaying what would normally show up
on the PC monitor.
All of mine have one and virtually all I see in hotels do too.
We always take a lap top to use in the hotel.
I suppose the MPAA is trying to get rid of them tho. They want
everyone to drink the HDMI Kool ade so they can come along and turn on
the DRM hardware that is in it. It is all part of a clever plot to
stop copying movies once and for all. You can't watch them if the
cable going to the TV blocks them, no matter what you are trying to
play them from.
On 4/8/2014 5:45 PM, email@example.com wrote:
Well, you must have a bunch of older flat screens then. And how old do
you think those TVs in those hotels are? That Westinghouse that I have
with a VGA input was made in '07. Given the lifespan of a flat panel TV
those hotels are set for another 20 years. lol
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 7:25:57 AM UTC-4, dadiOH wrote:
What do you mean a laptop is needed? If the OP has a smartphone, she
can use that with Chromecast. Or a tablet. IDK about you, but I'd rather
use one of those to control my TV media source than a laptop and if
you already have a smartphone, all you need is Chromecast.
That is where we're headed, to stream internet video directly to the TV.
Many new TVs have the capability built-in. Or you can buy a Chromecast
or similar cheap widget. Before I went out to buy a PC or notebook
to use for streaming video to a TV, I'd fully investigate the other alternatives, especially when they could be just $40.
Yeah, if you have a smartphone with an unlimited data plan. Plus you are
limited to Google Play, iTunes, Amazon, etc.
You can find a laptop on Craiglist for very little money and then it can
used as a dedicated media device.
My little brother bought a Chromecast last December and he isn't happy
with it because there are some kind of conflicts between it and his
Samsung tablet. He says it works fine with his laptop but was pissed
after he bought it because he wanted to use his tablet.
Personally I have all of the TV stations that I would ever need with my
current cable package. For movies, I use The Pirate Bay :)
And before you say it, I know a smartphone can be used with a router,
but then we are getting into another area. We don't know what kind of
setup the OP currently has. Also, some of the older smartphones don't
have wifi capability. And, my girlfriends iPhone on occasion has somehow
switched itself from my router to her 4G connection.
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 11:22:51 AM UTC-4, Ron wrote:
See my detailed reply to your previous post. With Chromecast of
a similar device, the streaming video does not go through the smartphone,
tablet, whatever. It's just used to choose the streaming video and
start it. The actual streaming video is from wireless router to the
But she does.
It would be a pretty old smartphone. They've all had that for
many years now. And so what? We shouldn't offer alternate
solutions because she might have an old smarthphone?
And, my girlfriends iPhone on occasion has somehow
I'm the one that brought up using a router. You said you could use a
smartphone, tablet, or PC. I don't recall you saying to use a router
*with* the smartphone and/or tablet.
So, if you stream a video with a smartphone using your 3G/4G connection
it isn't using any bandwidth?
Well, since the smartphone is just used to start the video then using
your cellular connection should be just fine, right?
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 12:43:37 PM UTC-4, Ron wrote:
Follow the thread. No one ever suggested using a smartphone to stream
video. The suggestion was made that she could use *Chromecast* or
a similar device. You use a smartphone, tablet, or PC to *control*
the Chromecast, select what you want to view, and start it. The streaming video doesn't go through the phone,tablet or PC. The streaming video goes
from internet cloud, to your wifi router, to the Chromecast. That is how
that and similar devices work.
Again, see the above and look at what Chromecast is and how it works.
No because the smartphone needs to be communicating with the
Chromecast device on your local wifi network. Cellular data
connection has no relevance.
Gotcha. I didn't know exactly how it worked but you have cleared that up.
Also, my brother was supposed to mail (he lives in another state) his
Chromecast to me but never did. So I guess it is sitting in a junk
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 11:07:20 AM UTC-4, Ron wrote:
The streaming video doesn't go through the smartphone. The smartphone
is just used to select what gets *streamed* to the Chromecast device.
The actual streaming video is from your wireless router directly
to the Chromecast. The above is what DaddiOh apparently doesn't
And it's incorrect that you're limited to a few sources. AFAIK,
anything that you can view on a Chrome browser, you can view on
I'm sure we could all find some incompatibility problems with anything.
And I'm not saying that she should use Chromecast. Just that:
A - As others have suggested, it's an alternate solution. If she
has a smartphone and wireless router she can implement it for $40
instead of buying a laptop.
B - A smartphone is what I'd use to control what I'm watching on
TV, rather than a notebook. A lot more convenient.
C - The whole world is moving to streaming video directly to the TV,
with many TV's already having built-in internet capability.
She can do whatever she pleases, but I don't see anything wrong with
looking at all the options and the choices should be made on fact,
not incorrect info. One advantage I see in a "PC" based approach
is that it can also serve as a DVR.
That's where I am too. Over the years I've looked at the available
movies from Netflix, etc, but there is enough similar stuff on cable
that I'm already paying for and not enough special stuff on the
NEtflixs, etc that I'm really interested in.
She specifically asked about laptops. Not smart phones, not
Someone provided a link to a gizmo and asked if a laptop was even needed. I
replied to that reply pointing out that the provided link specifically said
that an external device was needed. I don't care which one she - or you -
use but OP asked about laptops.
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 10:41:36 AM UTC-4, dadiOH wrote:
It's a mighty strange view that because she said she's looking at
buying a laptop as the solution, it means that a laptop is required.
She's clearly looking at solving a problem, ie getting internet video to a TV.
People proposed alternate possible solutions, which seems approriate,
one of which was Chromecast. Chromecast doesn't require a laptop
or even a PC. She could use a smartphone or tablet, which for most
people, is going to be a lot more convenient and easy to use.
And then when I pointed out that out, you responded with more
"OK, "monitor" was a poor choice of words; nevertheless, the laptop (for this
thread) is needed."
Just because she asked about using a laptop to
stream video to TV doesn't mean that a laptop is required for Chromecast.
It's an *alternate* solution and you can even use a smartphone.
Below is what you actually posted:
Don: > Do you need a laptop at all?
You: The site you linked says so...
"Google's Chromecast is a small dongle that plugs into a spare HDMI port on
your TV to stream media from the internet to the living room screen using
your smartphone, tablet or computer as a remote."
I don't care which one she - or you -
So, it's better that we just stick to what someone who obviously
isn't too sure what the best solution is, thinks they need, rather than offer
alternatives that may make more sense and cost less? Say she has
a smartphone. She can buy Chromecast for $40. But she should stick
with only considering a laptop because that's what she was originally
considering? When the whole world is moving to streaming internet
video to TV's directly, she shouldn't even consider it? Good grief.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.