Vega or Mule? (or other)

So here's my deal. I just bought a used ~1991 craftsman (emerson) contractor saw. Cast iron top and wings (webbed-style), 1.5HP. But the fence that came with it is terrible.

So I've been looking at aftermarket fences, and they're more expensive than I had hoped. So there are two choices I'm looking at now, in the $200 range are:

1) Vega Utility 26
formatting link
Mule M1025
formatting link
Both seem to get a lot of praise, probably because everyone's upgrading from the same POS fence that I have. The Mule looks a little strange to me, with it's twist lock instead of a lever, and exposed sharp-looking corners. But it's a front-only lock, and I feel like that would be good. I don't know, it just seems like it would be easier to lock it down parallel to the blade.

Has anyone seen or used these two? Is the twist lock on the Mule a good feature? Is the Vega's clamping at the back problematic at all?

Another option is to turn around an sell the thing and buy a Grizzly for only a little more than the craftsman + fence.

Thanks - J

Reply to
Jeff
Loading thread data ...

The fence on your vega link looks like the 50 "one i've got on my rockwell contrator's special -the saw and vega fence are about 30+ yrs old and have had a LOT of use. I've had no problems with it clamping front or back. It still glides nicely and clamps easily with a push on the lever and is dead on. I don't use the micro adjuster, as it is just as easy to move the fence a little. It's a good heavy aluminum extrusion so it should last forever. I also like the window gauge- easy to read the adhesive measuring tape on the rails. I would recommend fastening a piece of UHMV plastic on the fence- reduces friction between the board and fence, it will also will protect the fence - better to sacrifice a little plastic than risk the fence accidentally coming in contact with the blade. If you choose to add the plastic, do so before you put the adhesive measuring tape on the fence rails , so the fence can be zeroed with the blade. I doubt you'd be disappointed with the vega -dave

formatting link
2) Mule M1025
formatting link
>> Both seem to get a lot of praise, probably because everyone's

Reply to
Dave jackson

The Vega fence does not lock at the rear. It rides on the rear rail. Fence deflection as described in tool reviews by various magazines, etc. is virtually nonexistent. Don't have any experience with the Mule, heck, I've never even seen one. My Vega has given me sterling performance for several years. One hint if you do decide to go the Vega route. When adjusting the fence for parallel to the blade, you will be loosening four Allen head type machine screws to accomplish this. Unless Vega has made their own mod., you should place steel washers between the lock washer under the head of the Allen screw and the fence innards. If you don't, the lock washers will dig in to the aluminum and create a "memory" so that it will be VERY difficult to accomplish and hold any fine adjustment. This fix works perfectly, and I picked it up here on rec.WWing some time ago. Thanks again to whomever that was.

Hope this helps

formatting link
2) Mule M1025
formatting link
>> Both seem to get a lot of praise, probably because everyone's

Reply to
Bob Jones

Jeff:

I have used the Vega in doing some work at a school I go to at times and think it's a solid fence. I like the feature of adding hold downs on top of the fence. I doesn't move when hit by plywood.

The Mule has gotten good reviews in the latest review of fences by I think Wood Magazine. I've not used it but think about it when I think of replacing my own fence.

Why don't you write/email both of them? I'm sure they will send you the latest material on the fence and any reviews that were done.

MJ Wallace

Reply to
MJ Wallace

Never used either fence, but I specifically looked for a fence that locked in back. Once it's set PARALELL to the blade, it won't bend away from the cut due to release of internal stress in the wood during a cut. More accurate, IMHO.

Reply to
Gary DeWitt

Get a Vega you won't regret it. I have one with the long rails and legs.

formatting link
> 2) Mule M1025
formatting link
> >

Reply to
Dave

Don't have any experience with the Mule, but I do have a Vega on my Craftsman saw, and it works well. Company was helpful, too. The Vega doesn't lock at the back, it has a finger that just rides along, just under the rear rail. It's purpose is to preven the fence from lifting if a hold-down or stock feeder is attached to it. Since the Vega uses a tubular rail, if they didn't have that finger under the rear bar, the fence might lift if something like a hold-down was applying downward force toward the table. Those fences that use square front rails don't have that problem, I guess.

All in all, it was an easy installation, and a wonderful upgrade for the saw.

Henry Bibb

Reply to
Henry Q. Bibb

I've got the 52" Vega Utility fence and it is dead nice to use. There is a slot on each side of the top which their accessories fit into, and a 1/4" piece of masonite rounded on the edges will slide into as well.

On my vega I have installed the washers under the allen heads and I check my fence every 6 months. It doesn't move, it's my saw that moves. The micro adjust is outstanding and really allows fine adjustment. Only thing better I could think of would be the Incra tracks which allow exact repositioning. The Vega is limited by YOUR abilities.

I also have the small item feeder accessory and use it for anything getting under an 1" in width. It is very easy to use, and does it's job pretty well. With use of a featherboard, you get fine tolerance uniform width slices.

Alan

Reply to
Alan W

I second the steel washer thing... same problem. Excellent fence, BTW... great value.

Reply to
Don Sforza

I have the Mule Accusquare fence and have been using it for about a year now with no problems. It is head and shoulders above the old fence on my Craftsman saw. My saw is older than yours (Emerson, probably 80's vintage). The installation was simple and the fence dialed in perfectly. There were times originally that I wished the fence locked with a lever but I have gotten used to the twist lock and don't even think about it anymore. The fence is rock solid and I love the fact that mounting things to it is so easy with the T-slots built in on all sides.

All in all, I'd keep the Craftman and put either the Vega or Mulecab fence on it. I was about ready to sell my saw in a garage sale but after replacing the fence and performing a couple other minor tune-ups (solid pulleys, linkbelt and aligning the blade to the miter slot) I can live without a new saw. I bought the Mule because it was slightly less expensive than the Vega and I haven't regretted the purchase.

Reply to
Rossmoor Don

I've got a 1983 Craftsman with the Vega. I HIGHLY recommend it. The micro-adjustment mechanism is awesome, and the whole fence just works great.

I have no experience with the Mule.

-jbb

formatting link
2) Mule M1025
formatting link
>> Both seem to get a lot of praise, probably because everyone's

Reply to
J.B. Bobbitt

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.