Re: Flat Earth Theory To Be Taught In Science Classes

Page 4 of 4  


Only beaten by arrogance and ill founded pride.
--

-Mike-
snipped-for-privacy@alltel.net
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

Great post. Thanks.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snipped-for-privacy@alltel.net says...

Cite just *one* that (a) is clearly and unambiguously recognizable as a dinosaur and nothing else, AND (b) has not been proven to be a modern fake.

Faked drawings don't qualify as evidence of any sort, circumstantial or otherwise.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 15:29:32 -0400, "Mike Marlow"

really? I've never heard of any. where are they?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snip

A bit confused are you? The age of the earth has nothing to do with ID..... your confusing your groups

confused again

What could Noah's flood have to do with our origin? Although to hear the global warming zealots such a flood might happen<G>.

confused again

ID would have no inherent trouble supporting the BIG BANG......... What you have done is consistently confused creationists or young earthers (a very small group of Christian believers) with ID'rs snip

That is primarily what ID'rs believe

Maybe if you first found out what ID was and was not you might have a different understanding......young earth it is not.....Rod
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

someone starts to point out the illogicalities in the ID thinking, to simply aver that ID isn't that. In fact, the predominant proponents of ID adhere to the Adam and Eve creation, Garden of Eden, Noah and the flood and all the animals, etc. description of ID. If you've got a different version of ID, spell it out and explain why the fundamentalist Christian view is wrong.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

No, you did not point out any illogicalities...in fact you pointed out nothing of substance ....as you misidentified the very group you were attempting to illuminate. For sake of clarity young-earthers believe in a literal biblical origin, with a 7day creation, Adam, Noah's flood etc. all only a few thousand years ago. Where-as Intelligent design (try reading Hugh Ross) http://www.reasons.org/ proposes much of "mainstream science" albeit with a creator whom started it all......The two groups do not agree with each other (sometimes loudly) nor should they be confused with each other. Rod
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
[snip]

the biblical variety, suspiciously like the concept of Creationism. Just to be clear, however, for you,
Intelligent Design means that you:
-- DISAGREE with the concepts of Creationism and -- DISAGREE with the viewpoint of Intelligent Design as a Supreme Being who created the earth 6-10K years ago, and with the religious list of personalities that were involved -- AGREE with the work done in "mainstream science" which pertains to such things as gravity, energy, speed-of-light, etc.
-- is that right?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Wow, this pissant thread has gone on far too long.
wrote:

tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (email) http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/ (website)
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.