Wind Generator fails.

because if you dont, you will be dead.

We do in this country.

Oh, sorry, that would mean giving the third world a leg

No. we cant afford it. Anymore than anyone has ever given us a leg up historically.

I have an advantage: I've lived in Africa, and did the sums, because I used to think like you.

At best one could give about 1% a leg up, because to try and give 100% a leg up would mean everyone in the mud instead. Too heavy a load to heft.

Its where liberal socialism and Band Aid falls flat on its face: The reality is that what is actually required is education, of the very few its possible to realistically educate. And if you can manage it, a benign dictatorship.

Howevr its all academic now, because all but te richest countries are goind to see populatin crahes shortly: tehre is a liomit to psustaniable populatin, and we are over it.

Chaos mathematics has been applied to population density, and shows in all species, up to 10:1 peak to trough variation. Expect 90% of the worlds population to be dead in 150 years.

Staring quite shortly.

Now identify the 10% you are going to save.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher
Loading thread data ...

While I think there may well be a crash I don't agree with the way you got your timescales. When was the last crash? Black Death? And that wouldn't affect us now the same way it did then. Our current risks are pollution and energy exhaustion, and they have never before been an issue on a global scale - so you cannot draw comparisons with earlier humans, never mind other species.

Andy

Reply to
Andy Champ

I wouldn't be surprised if the global population didn't crash within

50 years let alone 150. If we last that long without it we probably won't crash, there will be a significant reduction say to 50% of current population level but not a crash down to 10%.

You are forgetting food and water. The lack of water is becoming a serious problem in quite a few places and I don't mean places that have just "not had any rain recently". Many ground water reserves are being consumed faster than they are being replenished.

Is it the WHO that expect that food production will have to double in the next 40 years to feed the worlds population? Who ever it is that is a pretty demanding target. Soylent Green any one?

Reply to
Dave Liquorice

Cue the entry stage left of the Three horseman of the Apocalypse;!...

Reply to
tony sayer

Y'knmow, a smart person 2000 odd years ago, could have looked at the Romans, and thought 'this efficiency and mechanisation, and rule and law and general civilisation stuff, is going to mean more people, more stuff, more trade., more shit, and where will it all end?

I think I'll write a disaster movie, and call it Revelations'

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember The Natural Philosopher saying something like:

Thank f*ck for that, I say.

Reply to
Grimly Curmudgeon

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember Mike saying something like:

Priceless, isn't it? Huge going on about free speech, earlier.

LOL!

Reply to
Grimly Curmudgeon

I am reading "The Inheritance of Rome A History of Europe from 400 to 1000" by Christopher Wickham. A little political misjudgement and the grain supplies from North Africa could no longer be relied on to feed Rome. No longer the tax base from empire to support a central civil administration; so the elite prefer a military career to the civil service, and holding land rather than civic office...

Reply to
djc

there are some chilling parallels.

between then, and now.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.