Vacuum cleaner for DIY - dry pickup only.

Can anyone recommend a vacuum cleaner for workshop DIY use?

I already have an Earlex WD1000 which I use for wet work - it's great at cleaning drain traps.

I also have an Aquavac, a Vax and a Dyson which are used for dry work. Of these the Aquavac is far and away the best and will happily pick up chunks of brick without complaint. It also has the biggest hose diameter.

Back in 2007 the consensus of opinion here was that the Earlex WD1200P was the one to buy. However, I don't rate my Earlex as that great for dry work (a) because of the small bore of the hose and (b) because the suction on my Aquavac is greater.

The Aquavac is only being retired because the can is rusting at the base, the motor is decidedly tired and the cooling fan is unguarded and took the tip off one of my fingers..

So, what would you recommend nowadays?

TIA

Richard

Reply to
RJS
Loading thread data ...

For quietness, suck, and a long power lead with really reliable coiling, the Henry family.

Reply to
newshound

If it's strictly sawdust/shavings/woodchips or very similar - consider getting a workshop dust/chip extractor.

I have the bottom of the range from Axminster - it takes bin-liner sized sacks and can fill one in a few minutes.

Think it's this one:

formatting link

Reply to
dom

You can buy a 60mm hose for the Earlex if that helps

formatting link

Reply to
The Medway Handyman

The George is better, having used one.

Dave

Reply to
Dave

Those sound quite fixable

NT

Reply to
Tabby

I'm happy enough with my Earlex for dry workshop - although I bought it the extra pleated filter and fat hose. Noisy, but cheap.

Reply to
Andy Dingley

Stop putting your fingers in there...f*ck, jobs a good'un.

Reply to
Nitro®

to be properly portable. Sorry should have included these in the first post.

Reply to
RJS

helps

formatting link
> --

Won't increasing the hose bore reduce the vacuum?

Richard

Reply to
RJS

Do you think so? About 15 years ago I tried to find new handles and wheeled base for the unit without success.

Richard

Reply to
RJS

Suction. Yes it will, but the airflow will increase.

A twin motor vacuum has much the same suction as a single motor machine, but double the airflow.

Reply to
The Medway Handyman

Well, generally speaking...

Small rust: wire brush, car body filler, wipe of paint. Major rust: rivet on a new sheet steel base Unguarded fan: EML, chip basket etc, rivet or weld on Motor: usually its a case of cleaning out the airpaths through the machine, but if the motor is actually faulty, rewinds are an option on a decent vac.

NT

Reply to
Tabby

Unless you use the Earlex a hell of a lot in 'wet' mode such that you really need separate machines, that would seem a good option, enabling you to use the same machine for both. I have one of these filters and have found the machine's performance (in 'dry' mode) to be radically increased over the old paper filters.

David

Reply to
Lobster

Be careful though that wet use (or even damp) and cement dust don't mix. They'll "corrode" the filter, and they aren't cheap.

Reply to
Andy Dingley

The most recent filters I have bought at Wickes no longer have the metal grille and are now all plastic, so do not rust Regards Bruce

Reply to
BruceB

Indeed. I did replace the cooling fan guard when it broke and did a 'cigar cutter' job on my right forefinger. Certainly a dollop of plastic plod will sort the rusty can. Just not sure that the motor deserves a great deal of investment. I fear that the cost of a rewind might exceed the cost of a new machine if one takes life expectancy into account.

R
Reply to
RJS

No, I meant the element itself. IMHE, they seem to not like damp alkalis.

Reply to
Andy Dingley

So what exactly is the advantage of higher air flow?

Reply to
VAG_dude

It should be able to carry more dirt and maybe bigger dirt.

Reply to
dennis

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.