formatting link
- posted
9 years ago
WOW saw this on craigs list... it's a beauty, and the shop is impressive too.
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Wow! Just Wow...
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Wow is right.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Wow is right. That's one helluva "Jerry" rig.
Sonny
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Bet you he still does not have enough clamps.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
I don't think the slab in my gar^H^H^Hshop could withstand the load!
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
He's got a few (see slides 21 and 22) but you're right, probably still not enough. ;-)
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
I don't think the side of my head could withstand the slap from SWMBO!!!
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
That's a beautiful thing.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Yes, but for the same money you can buy at least 60 Craftsman table top saws. Or make a down payment on the Festool model.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Nice saw. I've never seen one. Satifies the soul somehow to see something old restored. I recently looked at a nice lathe restoration on southbend's site.
The reason for the two blades is: A) to get around the deficiency in blade design at the time* B) longer time between blade changes C) something else D) none of the above
I choose A with a little of B.
I provided D to allow for those that insist on the contrary.
*new blades work fine for either cut- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
One for rip, one for crosscut.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
I believe A and B would be correct. Way back when, 1944, I don't believe that there were blades that could handle all cutting operations as well as today's modern blades. Not having to swap out a rip and cross cut blade would have been a big time saver in an industrial environment where time is money.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Maybe, if you've got "lots* of horsepower. A while back I bought a Freud Fusion blade which makes glass smooth crosscuts -as good as the vaunted Woodworker according to those who've tried both. But it's got too many teeth for ripping on my contractor style saw - it bogs down. I now go back to my trusty thin kerf rip blade for ripping.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Yes and no.. the combo blade works well at ripping and I do use it for most rips, but if you have to rip a lot of wood, I put a rip blade on. it's faster and more efficient.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
You're saying that your saw lacked power to push the blade. This oliver saw has two large motors. So I still think as I do about the design of the oliver.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
...
...
+1- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Yup... sometimes HP is the answer. That really hit home when I helped my father with a project and had to rip a scribed 2X4 on his Shopsmith with a thin kerf blade. OMG!!! Beyond a crawl feed rate the saw wanted to stall. I didn't realize how spoiled I'd become with my 3 HP cabinet saw! With a WWII blade it is more than OK but with a Freud rip blade it really shines. The Shopsmith... for rare use I guess it would be OK.
John
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
How do you like how how the rip does cross-cuts?
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
It sucks! It will cut the wood but in all seriousness, you get a ton of tear out.