I've been using the thin kerf style blades for a couple of years now but I'm beginning to think I ought to go back to the 1/8" kerfed blades for my TS and MS. Less deflection, longer life, more carbide for resharpening and a kerf that's easy to account for are just a few reasons. The only advantage to a thin kerf I can see is less strain on a motor when using a dull blade. What are your thoughts?
thin kerf vs. thick?
Mar 03, 2004
22 Replies
What about the wood you save with narrower kerfs?
Barry
I've been told by the folks that sell WW2, that think kerf is better suited for a TS with less that 3HP. I've got the regular kerf and I'm planning to by the thin kerf at the next Woodworkers Show in Sacramento.
I use a full kerf on a 2HP saw and it goes through wood like butter. Ok, I haven't tried 12/4 maple yet, but 4/4 maple is a breeze...
Does your saw have a hard time? Slow feed rates or bogging? If not, why buy a thin kerf blade if you have a very expensive regular kerf blade already?
isn't that a tiny amount? I prefer the std kerf blade for being less flexible and more apt to run true. I HATE the thin kerf blades on my miter box; can't do a wide cut without getting a curved cut. no matter how slow I feed the blade. learned the hard way when cutting shallow drawer pieces from baltic birch. That problem prompted me to halt a project and spend the day building a 2 runner sled with Incra slides. Now I crosscut anything I want dead straight, on the TS.
dave
B a r r y wrote:
Oh.. No... you really did not ask that.... LOL
Mel I believe you have a good grasp on the subject.
I hear them say that also but don't understand it. Maybe 1/2 hp for thin kerf as a regular kerf worked fine on my old 1 hp TS.
Unless you cut a lot of thick stock, I don't see much benefit but I do see some potential problems with wavy cuts. They also recommend a stabilizer with the thin kerf. For my use, I just don't seen enough of a benefit. Ed
For me, a thin kerf cuts better in two specific instances.
(1) on wood that's 1/4 or less, given equal quality/sharpness/etc of the blades. I'm at a loss to explain it, but I get a noticeably cleaner cut.
(2) on treated wood. (yea, go ahead and laugh, I rip/crosscut that stuff from time to time on my table saw for my neighbors...)
In just about any other case, especially the thicker or softer the wood, a full kerf works better for me.
++ DaveI always cut treated wood outside. You are either a saint or the neighbors make it worth your while, somehow. Are they blonde, by any chance? :)
dave
Dave wrote:
Trollin', trollin' trollin'...
Barry
Dave,
I switched to a 44 tooth GP Freud Diablo thin kerf on my 12" TS and have been real happy with it. I have been mainly dealing with hard maple up to
8/4s, but also ply, teak and cedar (up to 16/4). I also cut all the aluminum plate 3/4" for mounting servo motors for my CNC mill conversion. I just installed it as with any blade, no stabalizers. I have cross cut glued boards 20" wide and I can flip one side over and the butt is perfect. Having a sliding table Wadkin where everything is adjustable does help:).Another post mentioned re-sharpening, from memory I paid about $35.00 from either Lowe's of HD, at that price I'd rather have a new blade.
Bernard R
One of my neighbors had a wood shop for years and used thin kerf blades for just that reason. When he retired, he used all the wood saved from it to build a new house and furniture for it. Sure is a lot of glue joints with all the small pieces, but he saved a bundle. Ed
LOL... You know, years ago,,,15 maybe, they used that as a sales pitch... Less wasteful... When was the last time you used all of a board...
Uh huh..
OK.... time to fess up!!
Awww ... Now come on .... Who _gave_ him the forty tons of glue he needed ?????
Curious minds wanna know :-)
-- Steve
formatting link
Penury is the mother of invention!
I think the slider is what allows a straight cut. When a thin kerf blade is mounted on a non slider, it's more likely a wide cut will be bowed.
dave
Bernard Randall wrote:
I've got a Ridgid TS2400LS saw. We got it almost 2 years ago when I was starting taking classes in woodshop. If I knew then what I know now, I would have spent the extra money and bought a "real" cabinet saw. I've ripped alder, oak and cedar with the WW2 with no problems (maybe a little burn, but no hesitation).
Ok, you've convinced me to save the $90 at the show and buy some other "toy". Also I've got $85 coming to me from working at the polling place this last Tuesday. Wow, what can $175 buy?
Yeahbutt - what I lose in wood, I get back in sawdust. (Necessary for those of us who still need a'lotta "filler") :)
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required