Shaper vs. Router?

Hello, Everyone -

I was in the process of figuring out how I wanted to set up a routing station when it occurred to me: why not just purchase a shaper? By the time I bought a 3hp router, purchased and/or constructed a table, purchased and/or constructed a fence, and perhaps purchased a lift, I would have spent as much money as a Grizzly or Shop Fox 2-3hp dedicated shaper costs.

If the overall costs are comparable, is there any reason not to go with the shaper? I already have a hand-held router, so I do not need that flexibility. The only thing I can think of is that my current router bits would be unusable in the shaper.

Any thoughts?

Thanks!

- Josh

Reply to
Joshua
Loading thread data ...

I guess it depends on what you're going to be doing with it. General edge forming and decorative routing is easily done with a router as is rail and stile joints and even raised panels. However a shaper does all this and does it better in my opinion. Its a heavier more stable machine and made for hard work. I have both and use both but I find myself turning to the shaper more and more these days as my collection of cutters grows. Thats another thing too. Router bits are more affordable that shaper cutters. Of course a router is better at things like grooves and dados but like you said you have a hand held router you could use for these tasks. Theres my two cents........

Jim

Reply to
James D Kountz

They have an insert to allow you to use your bits with the Grizzly shaper.

Reply to
ddinc

Personally, I have problems [being of a cowardly nature] running large router bits at 20,000 rpm, so for those situations I prefer to use a shaper. On the other hand even though you can get a shaper chuck that will take your routerbits the smaller diameter bits really do not rotate fast enough to do the job well. that is the reason routers run at high speed to bring the tip speed up so that they cut more efficiently.

In the interest of safety, and being the cowardly type, even on the shaper I use a powerfeed whenever possible.

In short each machine is designed to perform it's design function best....mjh

Reply to
Mike Hide

The router follows the local surface of a twisted or bent board. If you don't have near perfect wood, the shaper will not work properly. Of course the shaper will spin a much bigger panel raiser than a router. I take full cuts with a 5" cutter and back cutter in oak and hickory on my SECO 3 HP. With the belt in the low speed setting, it cuts through with no groaning.

You can do with a very small and cheap router for everything but panel raising, where the shaper excels. Rails and stiles are usually straight, so I do those on the shaper too.

One thing you can do with a router table is make the table/fence as long as you like. That makes a big difference in handling large pieces and keeping them straight.

That said, you can use a cheap router (Freud) and make all the rest. Many of the bells and whistles in the catalog are really convenience extras.

Reply to
Wilson Lamb

If you don't have a straight board, what're you making other than a mess?

I like the router table for pattern following, box-joint making, small rabbets and dados , where, in spite of what some think, you can make numbers of grooves parallel to a fence.

Reply to
George

Why do you persist in posting this statement over and over? You seem completely unaware that it's not a good idea to use *either* a shaper *or* a router on a twisted or bent board.

Buy yourself a jointer, man!

-- Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

How come we choose from just two people to run for president and 50 for Miss America?

Reply to
Doug Miller

Well don't feel bad. I am scard of running large router bits at 20k, so I slow them down. Only the smaller ones do I spool up like that.

John

Mike Hide wrote:

Reply to
Eddie Munster

And to add to that, in this situation (twisted or bent board) the effect is going to be the same thing on either machine. I mean, you either use a fence or a bearing piloted bit in the router right? Well, on the shaper you either use a fence or rub collars so what's the difference. Besides to go along with Mr. Miller, its a moot point anyway since you ought not use crappy lumber to start with, straighten it up first and none of this matters.

Jim

Reply to
James D Kountz

Josh, check out groups.google.com. There are numerous threads on this subject. As an aside, I reached the same conclusion as you, bought a Woodtek 3 hp shaper and have been quite satisfied. Many shapers have an adapter spindle that lets you use 1/2" router bits.

Reply to
Mark & Juanita

In addition he seems to be unable to distinguish between using a router in a router table vs. a using a router as a hand-held router. The OP was discussing a router table, not using a hand-held router; one would assume he was planning on dedicating a router to the router table. There will be no difference (zero, zip, zilch, nada) in results between a twisted or bent board sent over a router in a router table or sent over a shaper table -- maybe with the exception of the faster kickback from the shaper table.

Reply to
Mark & Juanita

Personally, I have problems [being of a cowardly nature] running large router bits at 20,000 rpm, so for those situations I prefer to use a shaper. On the other hand even though you can get a shaper chuck that will take your routerbits the smaller diameter bits really do not rotate fast enough to do the job well. that is the reason routers run at high speed to bring the tip speed up so that they cut more efficiently.

In the interest of safety, and being the cowardly type, even on the shaper I use a powerfeed whenever possible.

In short each machine is designed to perform it's design function best....mjh

Reply to
Mike Hide

I was in your exact situation about a year or two back. I bought the Grizzly 1.5hp shaper and added the cast iron table wing extension and the router bit adapter. Never looked back.

One thing with the shaper that hasn't been mentioned yet; you can run the spindle both directions. Take the cutter off, flip it, and run it the other way. Not a really big issue for most, but comes in handy some times.

Reply to
Otto Hoel

For instance? Thanks.

-- Mark

Reply to
Mark Jerde

Any time when you are forced to run against the grain....mjh

Reply to
Mike Hide

Hey Mark care to elaborate some more on the Woodtek shaper? I was looking at these not too long ago and would like to hear the pros and cons straight from an actual user. Feel free to email me if you prefer.

Thanks,

Jim

Reply to
James D Kountz

Naah, please keep it here. ;-) Now that I finally have a planer & jointer my Grizzly catalog is starting to open all by itself to the shapers...

-- Mark

.
Reply to
Mark Jerde

My shaper is much quieter than my routers and is more relaxing to use on big projects. A shaper will always take considerable setup time: you don't just throw on a cutter and go. For one board, a router will be faster; for 5 or a hundred, the shaper is the way to go. I use the rule of moving the lightest thing, so if I'm rounding over a 20 ft board I will use the router. Howe

Reply to
H. Cochran

I got the shaper a little over 2 years ago after doing the trades of a dedicated router in a table or shaper. I got the unit with the sliding table attachment. I have found the sliding table attachment to be very useful for cutting rail and stile end-grain cuts, or any other cuts where the stock is sufficiently wide to allow a hold-down to be used.

Pros: 1. Table is dead-flat, there is no way I would have been able to get a router table to stay this flat. 2. Quiet -- I have never liked the screaming of routers and this unit just hums with power 3. The sliding table provides a good feed capability with stock that is sufficiently wide. 4. So far, I have not run into any problems using 1/2" shank router bits at the high speed setting. I don't try to force stock through very quickly, so this seems to work well.

Cons: 1. The height adjustment has a fair amount of backlash. I typically lower a cutter, tap on the top of the spindle with a rubber mallet to overcome the hysteresis, then approach the cut by raising the cutter. 2. Split fence is a bit finicky. I have found a process that lets me speed up the setup. I first get close with the fence using the bolt hold-downs that hold the fence to the table. After securing those bolts, I then use the two adjust screws for fine adjustment. What I don't do is tighten the lock-down bolts on those two screws beyond tight enough to keep the fence halves from having any play. This allows me to make adjustments without having to loosen and tighten those bolts.

As I say, so far I am quite satisfied with this purchase. I have been using Grizzly shaper cutters (3/4" bore seems to be a nice compromise between cost and mass) because I am not doing production quantity work. I do have a Freud kitchen cabinet set, but everything else thus far is Grizzly cutters. The only problem with Grizzly's I've run into thus far is that one of the rub collar bearings seems to be tight and does not rotate without heating.

One final bit of advice, when using the shaper, I try to set things up with safety in mind, especially as regards trying to make sure that I can make the cuts with some sort of guard in place.

Reply to
Mark & Juanita

Thanks Mark for the comments on the shaper. I have been using an ancient Craftsman, 1/2" spindle. Its pretty decent and it is about 36 years old now, back when Craftsman made somewhat acceptable machines. The only thing it really lacks is big power and 3/4" capacity. So when thumbing through the various "wishbooks" my eyes always seem to find their way to the shaper pages. Ive been looking seriously at the Grizzly and the Woodtek but haven't decided yet. I use a fair number of Grizz cutters too and I have found them to be fine in my experience. Your words will be taken into account though, its always great to hear from actual users!

Thanks again!

Jim

Reply to
James D Kountz

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.