Re: testpost read at your own risk

Jul 23, 2004 11 Replies


Testing


Failed. Alt.test and the other dozens of group for this type of thing are over ----> that way.

On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:43:14 -0400, "Brian In Hampton" vaguely proposed a theory ......and in reply I say!:

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHGRRRGRGRHHHHHHHH!

***************************************************** It's not the milk and honey we hate. It's having it rammed down our throats.

Test failed: it landed in rec.woodworking instead of in alt.test where it belonged.

-- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)

Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com You must use your REAL email address to get a response.

Failure: the ...1...2...3.... part did not appear as expected.

/rick.

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:38:00 GMT, snipped-for-privacy@milmac.com (Doug Miller) vaguely proposed a theory ......and in reply I say!:

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

In general I agree with this. But I feel that the occasional test to a group like this is needed. I have feeds where some groups worked and others not.

***************************************************** It's not the milk and honey we hate. It's having it rammed down our throats.

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:38:00 GMT, snipped-for-privacy@milmac.com (Doug Miller) vaguely proposed a theory ......and in reply I say!:

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

In general I agree with this. But I feel that the occasional test to a group like this is needed. I have feeds where some groups worked and others not.

***************************************************** It's not the milk and honey we hate. It's having it rammed down our throats.

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:38:00 GMT, snipped-for-privacy@milmac.com (Doug Miller) vaguely proposed a theory ......and in reply I say!:

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

In general I agree with this. But I feel that the occasional test to a group like this is needed. I have feeds where some groups worked and others not.

***************************************************** It's not the milk and honey we hate. It's having it rammed down our throats.

Oh give it a break, people. I think he tested in this NG because he is a regular poster here and he probably assumed that he would receive helpful feedback not flack.

That'll _only_ be the case if there's a moderated vs. unmoderated situation. The newsfeed is completely group-agnostic, it's an all or nothing situation. If it seems flaky for one group, it's just flaky.

Of course, posting a real message and treating it as your test message seems to escape many people.

So, I should welcome his dog crapping in my yard because I know him, is that it?

alt.test was devised long before I got here, Joe, and long before you as well, I'd suspect. The problems reasons were equally valid then as they are now.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required