I have. a mid-1950’s kitchen with stick built cabinets. There are n
o individual boxes, e.g. behind
3 doors is one large open space. I have been (very slowly) doing some upgra
des, like building
new utensil drawers, etc.
Over the past month or so, I converted one base cabinet section from 3 door
s to 4 drawers.
There are 2 double wide drawers for pots and pans and 2 single drawers for
containers, lids, etc.
Holy crap, what a difference! No more crawling on the floor to find that sm
all pot that
got pushed to back of the bottom shelf. No more grabbing the flashlight to
missing lid. SWMBO is so happy that she says I don't have to do anything el
drawers are enough. ;-)
I was able to use the old doors (along with some spares that were in the sh
ed from when
my neighbor had his kitchen replaced [same builder, same original kitchen])
matching drawer fronts for the time being. After building a bookcase for SW
cookbooks, I'm going to get back to building new doors and drawer fronts fo
r the entire
I don't know why we lived with base cabinet doors instead of drawers for so
long. So many
years of inconvenience. Pots and Pans drawers should be in the building cod
e for all
kitchen builds and remodels. People need to be protected from themselves. :
I took the lazy way out and installed seven deep plastic drawers in
four lower cabinets for the different kinds of pots and pans. They
work well. They have a base that screws into the shelf and the drawer
slides in those. To remove the drawer you tilt up the front.
On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 10:43:19 AM UTC-4, G Ross wrote:
binets. There are no individual boxes, e.g. behind
pgrades, like building
doors to 4 drawers.
t small pot that
to find that
g else, the
e shed from when
en]) to make
s for the entire
r so long. So many
code for all
Hey! This is rec.woodworking, not rec.plasticworking. :-)
Whatever saves the knees is what really matters. In a rental property that
built back in the 60's he inslalled base cabinets that had slide-out trays.
single bay units, not double wide drawers like I built, so you lost a littl
e space in each
cabinet, but they made the cabinets easier to use.
I wonder why it's taken so long for large drawers to become a standard. I d
on't know when they
started, but they sure are great.
On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 10:56:29 PM UTC-4, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
e no individual boxes, e.g. behind
grades, like building
oors to 4 drawers.
small pot that
to find that
shed from when
n]) to make
for the entire
so long. So many
code for all
Could it be that the wire drawers turned her off to drawers? I never liked
the look of wire
drawers and I don't think I'd like the feel.
However, the bold look and solid feel of a 2 bay wide wooden drawer on heav
undermount slides make a statement and are a pleasure to use.
On 23-Sep-17 8:54 AM, email@example.com wrote:
That's a major problem here...there are only two so it is cramped and
why I've not added drawers. I have thought of a sideless drawer other
than very short lip with undermount slide to minimize height loss so can
get to the back more easily, though.
I turned side-mount HD slides flat and "doubled-up" the number for
support on a slideout shelf for the printer in office...it was old heavy
laser and that worked well without taking but 1/2" in height. Thinking
of trying it in the kitchen as well...
The problem is that the more a space is divided, the less "stuff" that
can be crammed in the space. My wife is a baker, so has all sorts and
shapes of baking pans. The kitchen in the previous house was about
double the size of this one (though this house is 50% larger). The
kitchen still isn't small but it's just not the dream kitchen she had.
She's not happy about losing her kitchen but I picked up 2000ft^2 of
unfinished basement. ;-)
On 23-Sep-17 10:20 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Build some storage down there and add a conveyor...or a drone. :)
I just finished helping w/ noon dishes the other issue with the ones
here is they're face-frame and the drawer can't be wider than the
opening which makes narrower by that amount behind the frames...thin
things like a drippings collector tray are on edge against the side that
would be hard to utilize the same space with the drawer.
If packing a space full divisions may reduce total storage of items,
true, but a taller space with no dividers can also end up with a lot of
wasted air above the items sitting on the one level or the difficulty of
retrieving a given item is high owing to having to unstack/restack so
much to get to it...catch 22.
There really is no good solution to "real world" storage imo; the mag's
have gorgeous pictures of neatness but there's never really anything but
the show place settings and a fancy copper kettle in sight...the
daily-used stuff is nowhere to be seen.
On Saturday, September 23, 2017 at 1:51:21 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
Please see my other post about the ability to use the full height of the
space when a drawer is installed. Full stacking is easy (and consistent)
and access to the stack that used to be at the far back of the bottom shelf
is now achieved by simply reaching down into the full extension drawer.
As I mentioned, the loss of a couple of inches in both width and depth and
1" in physical height has - at least in my case - been more than compensated
for in *usable* height and the ease of organization of easily accessible
drawers vs. the shelves, especially the bottom shelf.
We should also make sure that we are comparing apples to apples: My drawers
are 2 bays wide. A 32" RO reduced to 30" of drawer space. Smaller single bay
drawers would be reduced by another 1" *each*. The wider drawers not only
allow for less loss, but gain the advantage of allowing the use of large
and/or odd shaped items because of the wide open real estate. We are definitely
overlapping the space that would be taken up at the "center" of 2 single wide
drawers. Yes, we lost the space behind the left and right face frame, but the
ability to easily use the full height plus the ease of organization more than
makes up for that loss.
Compared to this kitchen, that's huge! :)
And, I understood that; certainly having "all that room" would be a
major boon here.
These are single units...I don't recall exact width, but <24" opening
for certain...and, unfortunately, that's all the room there is room for,
one of those and the one on other side of range slightly smaller...well,
shoot, let's just go check--
They're even smaller than I thought 19-1/2 and 11-1/2 openings...
So, I'm guessing I'll not do anything altho I might just try a plain
flat bottom in there that does slide out just to see if the rear access
would help any...certainly as is now in the one there isn't anything in
the back of the larger one on the bottom shelf except a couple
less-often used pans; if there were a half-shelf that came forward it
would create a second level and that might make up for the loss in width
as there is a lot of air in there...
On Saturday, September 23, 2017 at 11:20:12 AM UTC-4, email@example.com wrote:
(This is in response to both of your recent posts. This one and the one where
you used the words "too restrictive")
Obviously, each kitchen and each user has different requirements, so I'm
not pushing back on your comments, just relaying *our* experience. My wife
cooks extensively and also bakes. (I saw "apple pie" on her To-Do list
for this weekend. 'Tis the season. Yahoo!)
We found that even after losing 2" in width, 2" in depth and 1" in height,
we feel like we have *more space* than before. As a reminder, I converted a
open section of a base cabinet that had 2 doors and a center stile into 2
double wide drawers, each 30" x 20". The bottom drawer is 11" in height and
the top drawer is 8". I used full extension slides.
Note: If I had installed single wide drawers into single bay base cabinets
this would be a totally different story. The fact that my drawers are 30" wide
with no center barrier makes a huge difference.
The drawers allow us to easily stack bowls, pots, pans, baking dishes, etc.,
within each other in nice neat columns. While the same was *possible* before
the drawers, it rarely happened. After we'd dig out that big bowl from the
back, it rarely made it back under the smaller bowls in the same manner. The
same with the pots and pans, etc. It was always a mess until one of us decided
to organize the shelves. Even when organized, we often had to take out the
stacks the front to get to the stacks in the back and then reverse the process
after the various pots, pans etc. were washed. Now we just look down into
the drawers where we can see everything that is in them. Lift the stuff on top,
take out what you need, put the rest back down - all while standing up, not
down the floor looking sideways into the dark back of the bottom shelf.
We left nothing out when we filled the drawers and we now have room for other
items that were previously stored elsewhere. The main reason is that we are
now using the full height of the space on a consistent basis, something that
rarely occurred with just the shelves. I'll admit that I originally told
SWMBO that she might have to give up some space and some items, so we were
pleasantly surprised that we actually *gained* space because it is so easy to
keep everything organized. In addition, everything ends up in the same place
as before it was used so we know what is in each drawer and don't have to
search for anything.
I supposed if you are 100% consistent in putting everything back in the same
place every time, then your shelves will stay organized, but that wasn't
how it worked with us. However, perfect organization wouldn't prevent the
need to get down on the floor the get items from the back. That not an issue
with the drawers.
On Saturday, September 23, 2017 at 8:43:32 PM UTC-4, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Yes! I kept the doors and turned them into fronts. It's only temporary because
I'm in the process of making all new doors and drawer fronts for the entire
kitchen. Winter project. Hopefully, we'll be painting the cabinets this spring,
then a new counter, then the doors and drawers fronts will be hung.
They "match" because the doors were converted to fronts, but I had to use
pieces and parts from the 3 doors and one spare that I had out in the shed.
Like I said, it's temporary and always there to remind me that I really need
to get busy on the new fronts.
This should help. The section in the images below used to have 3 doors, one
below each upper drawer. Behind the 3 doors was one big wide open space. 52"
wide, 23" deep, split horizontally about 60/40 by a shelf. Now it looks like
BTW, the small upper drawer boxes are also new, but of course the original
fronts fit just fine.
What I'm building will look like these:
Like I said earlier, technically I did lose space, but I got it all back
(plus some) due to the inherent organization that the drawers allow.
Well, I did add drawers _inside_ the base cabinets. They would have taken
up too much room *outside* the cabinets. ;-)
The under mount slides for the 2 large drawers are rated at 120#, the side
mounts for the other drawers are rated at 100#. The under mount slides are
screwed directly to the shelf. I made Swingman's 3-sided frames for the side
mounted slides. Since there are no walls inside the cabinets, there is
nothing to mount the cabinet member to, so Swingman's solution works great.
The frames were mounted to the shelf with pocket screws.
We both cook, although she does 99% of it, and does it much, much better.
We both do the dishes, so filling the cabinets was a shared frustration,
while filling the drawers is a shared pleasure.
The kitchen is old and tired. We've put it off for way too long, but the 4
kids are all out of college and out on their own, so we're doing some things
for ourselves while there's still time to enjoy it. Dropping $40K into a
complete gut job isn't how we want to spend our money, so I'm slowly
upgrading things little by little.
The whole old farm house is, too...folks refurb'ed it (full gut to studs
all outer walls to insulate/wiring, the works, etc.) in late '70s/early
'80s and it hasn't had anything inside since and shows.
I started the idea of refacing the cabinets the year after we came
(2000) to the point of buying the material and it's still waiting.
I intended same style doors but unlike you I removed one for sizing and
it's been off now since setting in the corner! :)
I built the originals for dad way back when; mom wanted "plain" so
they're just slab doors with routed edges. I wanted to go inset instead
of surface but I've run into problem that dad and I built a custom lazy
susan into the back corner and we used every fraction of an inch we
could for storage so the front lip of the cutout section protrudes 'til
it barely clears the 3/8" inset of the door. It would be a major job to
get into that cabinet to work on fixing that so I've been puzzling ever
since on just how to do what I really wanted...
We, too, have finally decided 'enough is enough' and are trying to
actually get some things going so I guess I'll just do the next best and
do the overlays. Unfortunately, the one thing we _did_ do was replace
the wornout Formica countertop with a faux stone but I didn't add
additional overhang as I was counting on inset doors...
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.