On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:26:02 -0600, the infamous Larry Blanchard scrawled the following:
Michael Mann and the East Anglia CRU crew, or parts thereof, come to immediate mind, sir. Haven't you been following that? They're funded for their output.
Algore and crew is another handful. The Brit courts mandated that no fewer that nine of his false claims in the movie had to be stated to the viewers before the movie could be shown in there schools. Brits have a horridly liberal/political school faculty, too. Gore is starting to rake in the carbon credit bucks now.
Paul Ehrlich and a crew for each of his totally defective and disproved books comes to several more handfuls. He was funded for his research and for his books. And the POS books of his are still for sale, ruining young minds anew.
James Hanson and computer modeling crew(s).
CRU admitted to _tossing_ raw data during the move to another building due to lack of storage space. No _real_ scientist in his right mind ever does that because it serves as a basis for your ongoing research. DUH! Now the CRU is saying that all the data can be replaced from original sources, but the collection they had which produced the data they put out will never be reassembled. I guess that's not too bad of a thing, as it will surely prove that the graphs they sent out were not created from the true data, but from a falsely created, manipulated set, nailing them to the wall.
Recommended to you by another alarmist, sir? "Updating the world on the Latest Climate Science" Science update or data update? Written by students at what Aussie school, er, University?
OK, they're claiming 2" of sea level rise over the past 15 years. Why isn't Florida under water? Why isn't everyone moving out of Hawaii, and off every other island in the world?
Executive Summary: 3.4mm/yr sea level rise.
Every report from the IPCC shows -diminishing- forecasts for doom. The first expected a 4.2 degree increase in global temps by 2100. The second 3.8, the third 3.5, the fourth 3.26 degrees C. Hansen thought it would rise 4.2 in '88 and revised it to 2.8 in '08. Monckton and crew say 0.5 degrees C rise by 2100. Slide 73.
These guys say the IPCC is underestimating everything. Hold onto your hat, Larry. They say the sky is, indeed, falling even faster than dreaded. NOT
-- Every day above ground is a Good Day(tm). -----------