And your boy is a lily white pure truthful soul, huh?
Let's take an example of his truthfulness:
"Health Care Humbug
Thursday, September 16, 2004; Page A30 Washington Post
AMERICANS HAVE come to expect political ads to stretch the truth, but
a recent duo from the Bush campaign cross the line. One, titled
"Medicare Hypocrisy," tries to blame Democratic nominee John F. Kerry
for the recent hike in Medicare premiums. The second, called
"Healthcare: Practical vs. Big Government," says the Kerry health care
plan would amount to a "government-run healthcare plan" costing a
whopping $1.5 trillion over 10 years.
On the matter of Medicare premiums, Mr. Kerry landed the first
below-the-belt punch. Seizing on the news of a 17.5 percent increase
in Medicare premiums, the Kerry spot said President Bush "imposes the
biggest Medicare premium increase in history" -- as if the decision
about how much seniors would pay were up to Mr. Bush, rather than
determined by a preset formula. Still, if Mr. Bush didn't "impose" the
premium hike, he's not blameless, either: The biggest part of the
increase is attributable to higher payments to physicians provided by
the new Medicare bill that he backed; another chunk is the result of
the bill's extra payments to insurers to induce them to offer coverage
The Bush campaign responded with an ad that made the Kerry campaign
look like a model of honest rhetoric. "John Kerry: He actually voted
for higher Medicare premiums -- before he came out against them," the
Bush ad said, managing to simultaneously blame Mr. Kerry and summon
the Kerry-as-flip-flopper image. The ad seeks to score points off Mr.
Kerry's statement that a 1997 law instituting the premium formula was
a "day of vindication for Americans" -- as if Mr. Kerry had been
celebrating socking it to seniors. In fact, the law, the Balanced
Budget Act of 1997, included a well-intentioned effort to rein in
Medicare costs, but what Mr. Kerry was praising was its child tax
credits for working-class families and expanded coverage for uninsured
children. Does Mr. Bush disagree with that assessment?
This week the Bush campaign unveiled an ad accusing Mr. Kerry of
advocating "a government-run healthcare plan" that puts "Washington
bureaucrats in control." This is not a caricature of Mr. Kerry's plan
-- it's fiction. The cost of Mr. Kerry's plan is open to debate; the
Kerry campaign puts it at $653 billion, while the Bush campaign, not
surprisingly, cites the $1.5 trillion estimate of a conservative think
tank. What's not open to debate is the falsity of the Bush campaign's
description of the Kerry plan as "a hostile government takeover of our
nation's health care system."
In fact, what's striking about Mr. Kerry's approach is the degree to
which it builds on the existing system. There are no employer
mandates, no price controls, no premium caps; instead, Mr. Kerry seeks
to lessen the financial pressure on employers through a voluntary
program in which the government would shoulder some of the costs of
catastrophic care. He also attempts to lower insurance costs for
individuals and small businesses by letting them buy into a version of
the plan offered to federal employees. And he would expand coverage
for, among others, uninsured children -- in the very government
program for which Mr. Bush pledged, in his nomination acceptance
speech, to "lead an aggressive effort to enroll millions of poor
children who are eligible but not signed up."
There's a legitimate debate to be had about the wisdom of the two
campaigns' health plans. But so far no one's having it.
...which is the pinnacle of unbiased reporting
My point is that on an issue I understand intimately, Kerry's lies are
blatant and obvious. There are more subtle issues that I do not have
as complete of knowledge on, but it's reasonable to expect that since
he lies so completely on this one topic, it's likely that he's lying on
other topics to an equivalent degree.
My point also included the thought that, since neither one of 'em are
someone I'd care to take to dinner, I'm picking the one whose record is
closest to my personal point of view.
My heavens! It seems we're quite polar opposites on this matter.
I'm sorry, but it does seem that actually Bush's are much more blatant
and proveably wrong. Maybe I need to watch more Fox.
But then, a lot of folks don't seem to understand the difference
between 527s that lie to smear and those that simply present
distasteful information that is, nevertheless proven factual.
Or, for that matter, the given reason for war in Iraq. Or that it
ain't currently on the happy road to democracy.
I rarely watch teevee news and never CBS.
So, you still think the war in Iraq is justifiable based on the threat
of a near immediate attack on the USA, with mushroom clouds an' all?
I mean, those new!, improved! SCUDs now can go 1/2 way round the
(An', ya know, electin' Kerry is sure as shootin' gonna bring on a
guar-an-teed 'terrist' attack on US. So, if that ain't a reason to
vote for shrub, I sure don't know what is).
And, you think Iraq is happily on the way to democracy?
Things are youknowwhere in a handbasket on so many fronts, but the
admin has y'all so scairt and keep adding to that fear. DON'T change
horses mid stream, even if the horse (and rider) is underwater and
Over the weekend I swore off repsonding to politics, but I failed
already. Based on the responses in this thread, I give up, and maybe
will hold to my pledge.
Besides, the shop is slowly getting unburied, and maybe I'll be able
to do some ww'g soon.
Not really, in the big picture, you could argue quite well that things are
going as could be expected with all the terrorists flushing themselves out.
We were in Japan for 7 years before we could leave, and people said back
then that creating a democracy could not be done there. Ever notice that
virtually all the violence is constrained to the Suni Triangle, and even
then mostly in Fallujia? What about the 25 million other people? When's
the last time you heard of significant problems in Basra, which I think is
the second largest city in the country?
What, you disagree that he's lying about assault weapons, or you disagree
with me that a flash surpressor and bayonet lug on a semi-auto firearm
that looks like a machine gun doesn't help Bin Ladin crash airplanes
into our buildings?
Dunno, I don't watch Fox. But as I said, on a topic that I know
intimately, Kerry's lies are so blatant and obvious that I clearly
can't trust him. Since it's also an issue I feel strongly about,
the combination of his voting record on the topic, and his blatant
lying about it, make it a deciding issue for me. I mean, the guy can't
make his point with truth, so he resorts to lies about what the
assault weapons ban was about? (you _do_ know it was about 4
cosmetic features rather than anything functional, right?)
And a lot of people don't understand that there is nothing inherently
evil about a "527", and that by making it so an organization of
interested people can't express their opinion is a bit on the side of
And whose fault is that? Kerry voted to approve the war too, remember?
He also said, a week or two ago, that even knowing what he knows now,
he'd _still_ vote to approve going to war. How do you reconcile that
with yourself, I wonder?
I wonder how anybody supporting Kerry reconciles anything w.r.t that
candidate. Aside from sheer, visceral hatred for Bush, they really can't
point to any reason to vote *for* Kerry. [Actually, they can point to some
Kerry position that they may support, but then I could point to the equal
but opposite position that Kerry has articulated on that same subject at
some different time].
Kerry supporters must reconcile that:
- Kerry voted for the war in Iraq
- Kerry is against the war in Iraq
- If given the chance to vote again, he would still vote for the war in
- Kerry supports our troops
- Kerry voted against the incremental funding to support our troops in Iraq
(but, in fairness, he voted for it before he voted against it)
- Kerry decries the ads by the Swift Boat Veterans through a 527C and
called upon President Bush to pull those ads (which is not possible since
Bush cannot be directing that 527c organization)
- Kerry calls on Bush to denounce the Swift boat ads
- Kerry tacitly and overtly accepts the support of Moveon.org and *that*
527c organization, refusing to denounce the wildly untruthful and near
libelous accusations put out by George Soros's organization
- Kerry agreed that Iraq had WMD's
- Kerry indicates that it is wrong for Bush to have taken action upon the
intelligence that Iraq had WMD's
- Kerry would go to the UN and get our allies to help in any future actions
- Kerry will not place this nation's sovreignty under the control of the UN
- Kerry will run a "kinder, gentler" war by involving our allies and going
to the UN
- Bush is unfit to lead the country in a time of crisis because he spent an
extra 7 minutes reading to children on the day of the 9/11 attacks (before
details regarding what exactly was happening had even been sorted out) in
order not to create panic
- Kerry, by his own admission, "couldn't think for 40 minutes" after
learning of the attacks. But, if he had been in Bush's shoes, he would
have immediately left to lead the country during this attack.
- The commission of war crimes and actions reminiscent of Jengis Kahn (his
pronounciation) does not disqualify one from seeking the office of
President of the US
- Missing a physical in the air national guard disqualifies one from
becoming president of the US
- Kerry decries the fact that the "assault weapons" ban has expired and his
more restrictive measures were not passed
- Kerry accepted a gun as a gift from the United Mine Workers -- a gun that
would have been prohibited under the weapons ban he supported and that
further would have made it illegal for him to accept as a gift.
- Kerry decries the waste of SUV's and their waste of fuel
- Kerry celebrates the production of SUV's when speaking to UAW members,
indicating that he has several
- Kerry indicates that the SUV's aren't his, they belong to his family, he
just rides in them
[Actually this is very consistent for a rich elitist -- we *should*
preserve those natural resources -- for him]
- Kerry believes we should spend whatever it takes to be successful in Iraq
- Kerry believes we are spending too much money in Iraq
- Kerry is concerned about the deficit and decries our expenditures in Iraq
- Kerry believes we should be spending the money we are spending in Iraq
here at home on things like education and medical coverage for everyone
- Kerry would get our troops out of Iraq as soon as he becomes president
- Kerry would get our troops out of Iraq within two years after becoming
- Kerry would get our troops out of Iraq within five years of becoming
- Kerry believes life begins at conception
- Kerry won't impose that view on others, thus, it is OK in his eyes, to
kill what he believes is a life
- Kerry was a Vietnam hero, getting medals for his service
- Kerry was an anti-war activist who accused all other Vietnam military
personnel of committing atrocities
- Kerry received 3 purple hearts
- Kerry never missed a duty day while in Vietnam
- Kerry admitted that he committed atrocities that were against the Geneva
convention like all other soldiers in Vietnam
- When confronted by a fellow Swift-boat veteran, he indicated that he was
not accusing the Swiftees of committing atrocities, it was all the "other"
soldiers [which, I'm sure, made all those "other" veterans feel real good]
- Bush should come clean and release all his records of his ANG duty. (Bush
has done so, he has signed form 180 allowing the Pentagon to release that
- Kerry has not, and refuses to release *his* records (He has not signed
standard form 180 yet).
- Kerry indicated that a person's service or non-service in Vietnam should
not be an issue or indicative of someone's ability to lead the country.
(Articulated during the Clinton campaign)
- Kerry indicates that his service in Vietnam is indicative of his ability
to lead the country
- Kerry spent Christmas 1968 in Cambodia, ordered to be there by a
president who denied any military personnel were in Cambodia and having to
dodge bullets from celebrating drunken South Vietnamese soldiers while he
was there that Christmas Eve.
- Nixon wasn't even president in 1968
- Kerry's own journals as documented by his biographer indicate he spent
Christmas eve 1968 far from the Cambodian border
On a more humorous side (as in, why lie about this?)
- 17 years ago, Kerry took great pride in telling a gathering about his
- In February or March this year, he claims he never claimed to have Irish
... and that's only a partial list
Does anyone, anywhere, have any idea what, exactly does John F Kerry
The problem with that analogy is that Kerry isn't anywhere *near* as good at
lying as Bill is. Although he's working on his weasel words. Maybe
Lockhart is coaching him. Case in point. In response to questions about
his Navy records, Kerry announced that he has released all of the records
that the Navy has given him. The key weasel words are "has given him". An
excellent example of a statement that may be technically accurate, but is
designed to leave a false impression. The fact is, Kerry has so far refused
to sign a form 180 to authorize the Navy to release everything it has.
What are you talking about? You jump into the middle of a conversation,
don't know who or what is being discussed and start in under your own
assumptions. I'll fill you in. The comparison was between Kerry and Clinton.
Both of which have a real problem with the truth.
Something Bush and Clinton have in common is the way they smirk when
they tell certain lies. When they know that they aren't fooling anyone
but their supporters don't care, that is when they both have this
evil smirk on their face.
When they think they hav eto fool people to get away with lying that
is when they seem absolutely sincere.
Both are a marked contrast to Reagan who apperas absolutely sincere all
the time. Probably Reagan was sincere inasmuch as he always believed
what he was saying, even if he knew it was untrue. That's called
More to the point voters might prefer a liar over an honest candidate
based on the policies they espouse. I say might, because it may
never come to pass that voters have a choice between an honest and
a dishonest candidate.
We had that choice in 1996. Too bad the honest one was such a boob.
Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)
Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter
by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com
You must use your REAL email address to get a response.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.