On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:41:46 -0500, email@example.com (J T)
Not if it cost you $101 to make it.
And if it cost you anywhere near $100 I strongly suspect you'd either
get tired of it or die of exhaustion before you reached that $900
profit you could have gotten finding that one person to buy it at
Of course if they don't want it in yellow then it's going to cost them
a lot more than $100 anyway.
You think that this design is simple?
This is a piece of CNC origami.
Look at the grain direction and ask yourself about how to accomplish
the legs in natural timber.
Look at how the legs butt out on their interior edges to produce a
squared section for joinery.
Ask yourself why the stiffeners on the obverse of the top run in the
direction that they do, rather than the opposite.
It is an admirable visual concept containing a deceptive manufacturing
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
Well, I should have said "rays" instead of waves. And I did note the
rays wrapped around. Rays do that. It's very nice grain,
Note also that the rays are more distinctive at the top than the bottom.
I'm talking about the leg shown in this picture.
Come on. Do people seriously think the leg was cut from a cut from a 36
inch wide, 6 inch long piece of cherry?
Sending unsolicited commercial e-mail to this account incurs a fee of
$500 per message, and acknowledges the legality of this contract.
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:04:43 +0000 (UTC), Bruce Barnett
I don't. But it would appear that it is cut from a 6 inch wide 36"
long piece of cherry. Blowing it up reveals the true grain running up
the leg, with the curl stretching across it, exactly like every other
piece of figured wood I've ever used (except bird's eye, of course).
I fail to see where the confusion is here- though on further
reflection, and once it's been blown up, I take back what I said about
the design. Don't care for the way the aprons and stretchers are
flush with the legs on the ends, while they are recessed on the front
and back. Seems that they didn't spend much time matching the color
of the wood, either.
All a matter of personal taste, I guess.
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:08:14 +0000 (UTC), Bruce Barnett
It's cherry, and I'm not talking about the figure, I'm talking about
the grain. The timber for the legs was selected to maximize the look
of the figure, rather than being selected for having grain run along
the curve. This creates a short-grain condition, particularly at the
bottom interior edge.
An even more exaggerated example of poor selection for grain direction
is in the forward stretcher.
The bump outs on the interior edge of the legs are needed to make this
overpriced piece of kit furniture able to be put together with those
silly sliding dovetails.
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
His patent is no more than a sales gimmick, just like his "green"
pitch (made from organically grown timber watered with pure,
unadulterated spring water and grown in a bed of reclaimed plastic
soda bottles; made in a shop heated only by the sun, and meticulously
produced by environmentally correct woodworkers wearing only
Birkenstocks and natural fiber aprons, working exclusively with tools
produced from recycled car bumpers).
You would not have to challenge his patent. Just reproduce what he
has done and he would have to sue you to prove infringement. Then
you could show that his "patent" is not worth a hoot. This joinery
has been around for hundres and hundreds of years. It's pure American
hucksterism and it sells.
My brother-in-law's psychiatrist ex-girlfriend bought into this stuff
big time. It's factory furniture, unless you ask her. <G> She also
went in big for these folks: <http://www.pompy.com/furniture/
I actually wasn't impressed with either company's work in person. I saw
it as higher priced institutional (library, Dr's office...) furniture,
and expected higher quality for what they get for it. As far as
higher-end factory furniture goes, I see a much higher quality from
Stickley, at a lower price.
I _am_ impressed with the marketing ability of Green and Pompanoosic, as
the local Pompanoosic store seems to move lots of stuff.
:>I'm looking at the S2 dining table, its a clean design I like but at $6k? :>Why so pricey for something this simple that I could make in a couple of :>days or am I living in the past?
: You think that this design is simple?
Pretty much, yah.
: Look at the grain direction and ask yourself about how to accomplish
: the legs in natural timber.
Lessee... figured cherry, 10/4, cut the curves on a bandsaw, finish
up with hand tools or a router and template. Keep the legs flat in one dimension
to keep the joinery simple.
: Look at how the legs butt out on their interior edges to produce a
: squared section for joinery.
Yes. A simplification to make it easier to build. A little less
finesse and style than would have occurred if the maker did
the joint with a continuous curve on the leg, and a joint to
: It is an admirable visual concept containing a deceptive manufacturing
No, it's a relatively simple design, made with very nice stock that
isn't very well matched through the piece, and priced about five
times over what a lot of other makers would charge.
But the guy did invent the sliding dovetail, so I guess he deserves it.
-- Andy Barss
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:20:43 +0000 (UTC), Andrew Barss
Not THAT is a statement!
If "a lot of other makers" sell that table for $1200, they deserve to
$1200?? <G> Where are you live? I'll be there tomorrow to buy an
18 wheeler load of furniture to bring home and resell.
A friend of mine walked into my office one day just in time to hear a
recording of Pavarotti where he lets fly with one of his power
My buddy said: "Meh..if I had a voice like that, I could sing like
Now go take another look at that table.
You are so right.. all you need is the material, time, machinery and
talent, and you can make a table like that too. Never in 2 days
though, even if you included 5 more dreamers like yourself.
Me? I think you're a troll.
I was the OP and thanks for all the replies. Some of you guys are seeing the
construction in much more detail that I could ever imagined so your comments
are justified. However it wasn't my intention to duplicate an exact copy of
this table including interlocking joineries and other details but using it
as inspiration keeping the lines and shape clean and pleasing. I use a CAD
program and a size E plotter so full scale parts will be drawn such that
complicated geometry with compound curves and mating parts won't be much of
a problem - thanks to CAD, not my solid geometry skills. Also I will keep
things basic and without extension leaves. I'm sure I've underestimated the
time as usual for projects like this but I'm also sure it will go fast once
the pattern is fabricated if I decide to make more than one. For $6K I
rather spend it on more tools.
Nice figured wood, elegant, curved survaces and apparently traditional
joinery- I'm thinking you may be living in the past. While I wouldn't
feel right about charging someone that much for a piece like that
either, when you consider what a regular POS table costs, $6k is about
right for the increased quality and appearance that is obvious in that
Then again, you can make it in a couple of days, so you're lucky in
that you don't have to care what someone else is charging for it
unless you want to! :)
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.