sorry, wrote obverse, meant reverse.
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
sorry, wrote obverse, meant reverse.
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
His patent is no more than a sales gimmick, just like his "green" pitch (made from organically grown timber watered with pure, unadulterated spring water and grown in a bed of reclaimed plastic soda bottles; made in a shop heated only by the sun, and meticulously produced by environmentally correct woodworkers wearing only Birkenstocks and natural fiber aprons, working exclusively with tools produced from recycled car bumpers).
You would not have to challenge his patent. Just reproduce what he has done and he would have to sue you to prove infringement. Then you could show that his "patent" is not worth a hoot. This joinery has been around for hundres and hundreds of years. It's pure American hucksterism and it sells.
Joe
Yabbut.. I already have a gizmo.
Eh?
From what I read this is so they can use a sliding dovetail. There's no reason they couldn't CNC a curved joint if they wanted to.
I have no idea what those are for.
-Leuf
A friend of mine walked into my office one day just in time to hear a recording of Pavarotti where he lets fly with one of his power finishes. My buddy said: "Meh..if I had a voice like that, I could sing like that too."
Now go take another look at that table. You are so right.. all you need is the material, time, machinery and talent, and you can make a table like that too. Never in 2 days though, even if you included 5 more dreamers like yourself.
Me? I think you're a troll.
rI'm working on a patent for something I'm calling the "glueless butt joint". I am not going to tell you how it's done but I will give a hint: It uses headed long cylindrical metal pieces which are inserted through the joint by the impact from a piece of heavy iron on the end of a stick. I also intend to patent the cylindrical metal pieces and the iron thingy too. I just need to come up with a name.
-g
"Leon" wrote in news:RZLyh.42159$Gr2.4404 @newssvr21.news.prodigy.net:
pango bango
Regards,
Tom Watson
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
Stick Schtick
I was the OP and thanks for all the replies. Some of you guys are seeing the construction in much more detail that I could ever imagined so your comments are justified. However it wasn't my intention to duplicate an exact copy of this table including interlocking joineries and other details but using it as inspiration keeping the lines and shape clean and pleasing. I use a CAD program and a size E plotter so full scale parts will be drawn such that complicated geometry with compound curves and mating parts won't be much of a problem - thanks to CAD, not my solid geometry skills. Also I will keep things basic and without extension leaves. I'm sure I've underestimated the time as usual for projects like this but I'm also sure it will go fast once the pattern is fabricated if I decide to make more than one. For $6K I rather spend it on more tools.
That's the way it works in an ideal world. In the real world fending him off costs.
Nice figured wood, elegant, curved survaces and apparently traditional joinery- I'm thinking you may be living in the past. While I wouldn't feel right about charging someone that much for a piece like that either, when you consider what a regular POS table costs, $6k is about right for the increased quality and appearance that is obvious in that table.
Then again, you can make it in a couple of days, so you're lucky in that you don't have to care what someone else is charging for it unless you want to! :)
Isn't that just curly maple? I think the grain is going in the normal direction while the "waves" creates the illusion the grain is going in the opposite direction.
They claim it's cherry, and if it's "waves" note that they wrap around the leg.
My brother-in-law's psychiatrist ex-girlfriend bought into this stuff big time. It's factory furniture, unless you ask her. She also went in big for these folks:
I actually wasn't impressed with either company's work in person. I saw it as higher priced institutional (library, Dr's office...) furniture, and expected higher quality for what they get for it. As far as higher-end factory furniture goes, I see a much higher quality from Stickley, at a lower price.
I _am_ impressed with the marketing ability of Green and Pompanoosic, as the local Pompanoosic store seems to move lots of stuff.
Well, I should have said "rays" instead of waves. And I did note the rays wrapped around. Rays do that. It's very nice grain, Note also that the rays are more distinctive at the top than the bottom. I'm talking about the leg shown in this picture.
I don't. But it would appear that it is cut from a 6 inch wide 36" long piece of cherry. Blowing it up reveals the true grain running up the leg, with the curl stretching across it, exactly like every other piece of figured wood I've ever used (except bird's eye, of course).
I fail to see where the confusion is here- though on further reflection, and once it's been blown up, I take back what I said about the design. Don't care for the way the aprons and stretchers are flush with the legs on the ends, while they are recessed on the front and back. Seems that they didn't spend much time matching the color of the wood, either.
All a matter of personal taste, I guess.
:>
:>
: You think that this design is simple?
Pretty much, yah.
: Look at the grain direction and ask yourself about how to accomplish : the legs in natural timber.
Lessee... figured cherry, 10/4, cut the curves on a bandsaw, finish up with hand tools or a router and template. Keep the legs flat in one dimension to keep the joinery simple.
: Look at how the legs butt out on their interior edges to produce a : squared section for joinery.
Yes. A simplification to make it easier to build. A little less finesse and style than would have occurred if the maker did the joint with a continuous curve on the leg, and a joint to fit that.
: It is an admirable visual concept containing a deceptive manufacturing : truth.
No, it's a relatively simple design, made with very nice stock that isn't very well matched through the piece, and priced about five times over what a lot of other makers would charge.
But the guy did invent the sliding dovetail, so I guess he deserves it.
-- Andy Barss
Yup.
I suppose some people don't realize that curly grain is not just on the surface.
Not THAT is a statement!
If "a lot of other makers" sell that table for $1200, they deserve to be broke.
$1200?? Where are you live? I'll be there tomorrow to buy an
18 wheeler load of furniture to bring home and resell.
It's cherry, and I'm not talking about the figure, I'm talking about the grain. The timber for the legs was selected to maximize the look of the figure, rather than being selected for having grain run along the curve. This creates a short-grain condition, particularly at the bottom interior edge.
An even more exaggerated example of poor selection for grain direction is in the forward stretcher.
The bump outs on the interior edge of the legs are needed to make this overpriced piece of kit furniture able to be put together with those silly sliding dovetails.
Regards,
Tom Watson
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required