We made the mistake of letting our contractor use the 3-step production laquer process in our new hours five years ago. The following spring I finished the basement and used the same product that we ordered from the original contrator's batch.
Advanteages:
- Lets the paint contractor get in, and out, of a 1,600 sq ft house in two days while he is doing the same in another new home down the street. (profit max). The stuff dries fast and the painter can often get throught two of the threes steps in one day.
- Lets the paint contractor put one decent gun operator in the house with one or two minimum wage high school dropouts to wipe up behind him (cost).
Disadvantages:
- More of a wood cover than stain. The oak in our house is attractive if you don't look close. A picky woodworker will not find the effect of deep staining or any grain depth you find with oil base and poly or other finish. It looks like what it is - a colored laquer cover over the wood.
- Not durable. After 5 years, many of our baseboards and lower cabinets need to be recoated or finished. I believe part of this problem is too little product applied during construction. However the window sills that same to have heaver coat have not held up well either.
- Stinky, toxic. I sprayed the same product in our basement with a respirator and the windows open. Still a dizzying experience. I will say, however, that the sealer and final coat are fairly easy to apply and are forgiving.
- The final piece of the basement finish was a bar that was installed several months later. I did use the Laquer stain (brush coated), skipped the sealer and finished with satin poly. Looks much better but kinda sticks out against the surrounding wood work (at least to me).
I will not use the product again.