WiFi - further info

"Wi-Fi connections can be blocked or the Internet speed lowered by having other devices in the same area. Wi-Fi protocols are designed to share the wavebands reasonably fairly, and this often works with little to no disruption. To minimize collisions with Wi-Fi and non-Wi-Fi devices, Wi-Fi employs Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA), where transmitters listen before transmitting and delay transmission of packets if they detect that other devices are active on the channel, or if noise is detected from adjacent channels or non-Wi-Fi sources. Nevertheless, Wi-Fi networks are still susceptible to the hidden node and exposed node problem.[86]

A standard speed Wi-Fi signal occupies *five* channels in the 2.4 GHz band. Interference can be caused by overlapping channels. Any two channel numbers that differ by five or more, such as 2 and 7, do not overlap (no adjacent-channel interference). The oft-repeated adage that channels 1, 6, and 11 are the only non-overlapping channels is, therefore, not accurate. Channels 1, 6, and 11 are the only group of three non-overlapping channels *in North America*. However, whether the overlap is significant depends on physical spacing. Channels that are four apart interfere a negligible amount-much less than reusing channels (which causes co-channel interference)-if transmitters are at least a few metres apart.[87] In Europe and Japan where channel 13 is available, using Channels 1, 5, 9, and 13 for 802.11g and 802.11n is recommended. "

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher
Loading thread data ...

Wifi on 2.4GHz can be damaged by emissions from (shielded) USB3 cables which are in operational state. There is a broad emission peak at around

2.5GHz or so from the USB3 cable just due to data bit transmission at 5GHz. Intel offers a paper on this, a PDF document. The Intel document has advice for peripheral makers regarding reducing their emissions.

If two people share a building, and signal coming through the wall is a problem, they could:

1) One party switch their dual band setup to 5GHz. This assumes both router and peripheral (computer) devices support 5GHz. 2) Place RF paint on the wall or use materials seen on Faraday cages, to reduce the signal level coming through the wall. It would not take a very complicated building structure, to make this impossible to implement with the required characteristics.

Wifi is set up for co-existence with older Wifi standards, and aggressive modern features are turned off if older Wifi standards are detected in usage. This is the "greenfield" provision. Wifi also co-exists with Bluetooth, even though both share 2.4GHz together. Which should allow a Bluetooth mouse to work next to a Wifi setup.

There are telephone extenders that don't play nicely at 2.4Ghz. There is leakage from microwave ovens, but that only stays on for minutes at a time.

Apparently on 5GHz band, there are a multitude of channels, with some channels sharing bandwidth with powerful radars. If a radar signal is detected, the router blacklists that frequency and won't use it. The first group of channels at 5GHz should still work. So some of the 5GHz channels are "whitespace" channels, meaning the equipment uses them if no "more important usage" is detected.

But 2.4Ghz is kind of a cesspit of emissions, and it's a wonder anything can work there (Wifi usage in apartment buildings). And 5GHz doesn't penetrate walls, making it less useful in a multistory house.

This little animation shows how Wifi signals shoot down hallways. And why the signal level varies quite a bit.

formatting link
Paul

Reply to
Paul

Paul explained on 01/12/2020 :

The animation fails to show any reflected signals, it only shows the line of site reception levels and reduced levels passing through walls.

Reply to
Harry Bloomfield, Esq.

Why did he want wifi in his bathroom?

Reply to
Andy Burns

Perhaps he likes to browse in there..

Reply to
Harry Bloomfield, Esq.

It is the nature of simulation, that everyone will find fault with what you've done.

Paul

Reply to
Paul

Safety?

Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff (Sofa

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.