I need a replacement actuator head for a Honeywell 2 port zone valve so was interested to find a pattern replacement at Toolstation:
On this basis I can't recommend it for installation, pay an extra tenner for the original part.
I need a replacement actuator head for a Honeywell 2 port zone valve so was interested to find a pattern replacement at Toolstation:
On this basis I can't recommend it for installation, pay an extra tenner for the original part.
Toolstation used to do a 'Tower' brand generic head but this looks different. Of course it's only badge engineering but it's an interesting reflection on CORGI that they should try to exploit their reputation with the public by putting their name to what must be, at best, fairly meh bits of kit.
On the subject of pattern parts, I noticed these:
What was wrong with the original? In my (limited) experience it's the motor itself that fails and it's easily obtainable for about £7-10.
Could it be a rogue counterfeit on? This sort of thing is turning up in almost everything these days.
Brian
I think it's all they have left . . . .
As an update, I thought I'd wire it up to check the motor driven operation and it's fookd, cogs slip under motor drive too so it going back. I'll let you know if the replacement fares any better.
In article , Graham. writes
It's the cogs that have worn out so it's a complete replacement. One of my reasons for being not being a fan Honeywell's enforced proportional thermostatic control with multiple cycles per hour, it's wearing out my controls prematurely.
Danfoss kit has the abilty to turn the valve knakering proportional control off, in fact the instructsions tell you that doing so is adviseable on systems with zone valves.
Yes, there are a few that are switchable, inc Siemens. I'm about to install a Salus RT500 and an RT300 as a trial to see if they'll do, they're non proportional and definitely budget end but if I fully implement one room per zone then I'll be needing quite a few.
Such a shame as the Honeywells are so easy to set/use.
erm .... As CORGI is a long defunct entity I was under the impression "they"don;t have a reputation anymore? Just numerous shady shysters happily allowing gullible punters to believe they do by putting "corgi" all over anything?
Jim K
fred wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@y.z:
Did you attach the head to the valve to test?
Even the honeywell heads will crunch and grind if not attached securly to the valve when operated by hand or electric motor.
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: snipped-for-privacy@netfront.net ---
In article , Heliotrope Smith writes
Alas no and I think you have hit the nail on the head.
Thank you for the education, many valves fitted but no heads changed. That was indeed the problem and basic tests show it is operating correctly. Apologies to Corgi for the faulty information but comments on sharp edges remain.
Thanks again.
Well the name is still well known even if they no longer have the government sponsored accreditation gig...
(gov apparently did not realise they did not have the rights to the name and thought they could shift it to them that are now Gas Safe)
Presumably the dodgy shysters would actually need to be CORGI to use their trade mark since they still exist as a legal entity and hence could defend their trade mark.
mm ok the official shyster (singular) then:-
quote "the name your customers trust" sums it up to me ;>)
Jim K
Just purchased the corgi valve from toolstation. The item appears to be very well made and is not dissimilar in anyway to the Honeywell valves which I have recently fitted. I hope it works as well as it looks but don’t have any concerns so far as the spring return from manual is smooth and consistent!
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.