Vegans 40pc more likely to suffer bone fractures.

Nov 24, 2020 Last reply: 5 years ago 50 Replies

Pass. No doubt T i m will be along shortly to give a long list of foods unnaturally fortified with iodine.

Like the Cambodia of Pol Pot, you mean?

It's of academic interest only. I meana I've NEVER been involved in any sort of car accident or public transport accident I don;t have a car and rarley travel by car. So all those that have a car have a far higher risk of dying in a car than I do.

Of course if you're willing to go up to David Hayes and tell him he is unheathy and will suffer from broken bones go for it ;-)

was that the ones you shot on your character building trips ? ..

and my £200 heating grant I spent on the Mustang insurance.....and my free food boxes ......

formatting link
what a shocking waste of tax payers money they could buy then in ENGLAND FOR A COUPLE OF QUID AS YOU SAID ....TEE HEE

<snip>

formatting link
Cheers, T i m

Interestingly, earlier this week I had a very good vegan pizza for our evening meal.

I made it into a balanced meal, which tasted even better, by adding chicken and cheese to the topping. No need for all those artificial, expensive, and environment-destroying supplements! It was washed down with vegan Prosecco and followed by a vegan home-made fruit salad.

Ditto.

It' meaningless regardless, except perhaps to those who suffer autism.

<snip>

Let's hope you never have a stroke and have to learn about brain lateralisation the hard way.

The principal of brain lateralisation is around those functions that are typically dominant in one of the two very (physically) separate brain hemispheres.

Such dominance's are clearly viewable under FMRI tests.

The problem with left brainers is it's very rare for them to be willing to take on any concept, unless it's the first one they stumble on and gives them some level of confirmation bias re any level of assumption of previous understanding on the subject.

This also means that left brainers generally sop evolving, stop taking onboard any changes to our level of understanding of anything, they hare unable to continue to evolve.

Like, we (the majority of the worlds population) 'used to' sometimes eat meat and drink milk to *survive* (many peoples rarely did either, ever) but now we don't, so some of us evolve and adapt to this new version of us.

The self confessed 'animal-like', meat eating cave dwellers carry on doing what they have always done because they haven't evolved to do anything different.

formatting link
Luckily, society (a driver of what's considered right or wrong if morality hasn't already done so, like with slavery) *is* evolving and so things are already changing.

And every time the barbaric things we do to animals become highlighted (like the illegal foxhunting, mink farming, zoonotic pandemics etc), the ratchet generally locks in and yet another wrong is stopped.

It's funny listening those trying to on one hand, prove black is white whilst simultaneously demonstrating the very logical inconsistency they deny. 'I love all animals ... (except the arbitrary list of those I'm happy to torture, exploit and kill, often *just* because I like how their seared flesh or the excretions not meant for us but their own children, taste)'.

formatting link
Maybe such a balance in the brain, a logical consistency, is only available to right brainers?

Cheers, T i m

Having met RDS I would say that the bloke on the right would have to be

12 feet tall.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required