Charles is #1, William #2, William's sprogs #3,4,5, hence Harry is #6
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Those 2 royals
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
His brother's kids displace him (even the female one now)
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Don't think so. If Charles were to die before his mother, the next in line would be Wills.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Your snipping removes the thread context.
I was replying to Doom who said Anne was more senior than Wills. While that is obviously true in age, so are many others. In terms of succession, she isn't.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
The names "Anne" or "Wills" didn't appear in your message I replied to...
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Bill's brats.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
surely not. wills is #2, then his kids
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
And Beatrice is #8!!!
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Archie is #7, Andrew is #8, then Beatrice.
Unless the new guidelines which apply to William's daughter, also apply retroactively to Anne and her kids.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Forgot Archie.
No, she is in line after Edward and his children.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
"Harry could make a good fist of it."
But could Megan take it and would enough people pay to watch that?
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Don't think it does.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
No, it only applies to recently-born girls, such as Charlotte.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Apparently KY Jelly works wonders.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Kate's rumoured to be up the duff again, so he might end up #7. Maybe that's why he's given up and wants to move abroad!
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Er, no I didn't.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
**************
From: Cursitor Doom snipped-for-privacy@notformail.com Subject: Re: Those 2 royals Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 20:45 Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
I also find it extremely vexing when this pair are described in the media as "senior royals." That term really only properly applies to the Queen, Philip, Charles and Anne.
**********Both Wills and Harry are more senior than Anne in terms of accession. Despite your hypothesis about the parentage of Harry.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Good job the main heirs are all male: or there'd be Pretenders who don't hold with this women's lib malarky.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Ah, okay now I have the context I can see what you mean.
Not my hypothesis, Dave. Pretty much an established fact!
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
They're both a grave disappointment to anyone.
I see video on Twitter of Harry touting for Disney voiceovers for Meghan. I read on the Beeb that they have or want to team up with Oprah Winfrey, FFS. Meghan it seems has a "love of writing" and had a "lifestyle blog where she shared beauty, fashion and travel tips". I can see that these two are intellectual giants and we'll soon be hanging on their every word. Give me strength.