Telephone Question...

May 13, 2004 114 Replies

I would go along with that, in fact I would say for most people "want" is almost always the key factor in a buying decision - the only time need comes into the equation is when one is trying to justify that decision later! When "need" takes over the decision process you have what the sales bods call a "distress purchase" (i.e. thouse tyres will not get through the MOT).

Personally I installed a PBX because I wanted one - I am sure I could have coped without.

Having said that DECT never really entered into the equation - as would be the case for most people who already have a telecoms setup. Why throw out lots of good working handsets that are comfortable to use, just so you can have a dinky mobile sized handset that keeps getting lost, and runs out of battery half way though a call?

Wiring is a non issue - a PBX will not introduce any extra assuming you already have hard wired sockets in each room.

A PBX will:

Deal with Fax and modem traffic with ease Support multiple lines with ease A PBX will let me transfer a call to a (predictable) location rather than somewhere in the back of the couch! The speaker phone on my office handset works better than any I have found on a DECT setup, it has a headset attached with variable gain amplifier which is ideal for doing tech support when using computers. When my daughter gets older I can set selective call bars on her extension, and limit max outgoing call duration ;-) Incoming lines can ring appropriate handsets and get diverted to the appropriate answer machines.

So other than costing more and offering less what has DECT got to offer?

A PBX will:

Better yet, you can present her with an itemised bill :-)

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

In message , Andy Hall writes

Like my phone bill which suddenly jumped from £50 / month to £250 / month? when a certain teenager got a new girlfriend

At least these days you can get tarrifs that offer more or less unlimited calls for not that much increase in the basic line rental, certainly less than your =A350/month. Indeed I don't think BT now do any= "line rental only" tarrifs they all have some element of "free" calls.

Of course this assumes that said BF was on a landline not his mobile but even then I think there are packages about that offer substantial reductions on calls to mobiles. Do some reasearch on other operators and what BT have to offer...

Typical bloody socialist. Ignore what people want and tell them what they need.

Bet you drive a Trabant, too.

Better yet, you can call bar her number...

There's a revenue opportunity here :-)

We all know that teenager's brains are between their legs. :-)

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

It was more the WTF reaction when I first saw the bill

Well, quite. No doubt strong words were had with said teenager. I'm just keeping a passing eye on the options but we have a another 6 years before we have a teenager in the house so things will have changed greatly by then. Maybe all UK call charges, mobile or fixed will have dissappeared by then.

Probably... ;-)

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

That's wishful thinking. Keep in mind that the great thing about teenagers is that they will never know so much again.

I think they could load all of the costs onto SMS services and still do very well.

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

Pity me, as next year for 6 long days I'll be the proud father of three teenage boys

Nick Brooks

You have my deepest sympathy.

BTW. There isn't a dramatic change as they become 20. There's no stage of metamorphosing from a caterpillar to chrysalis and butterfly.

From the amount of food consumed, the caterpillar stage lasts an awful long time.

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required