Seems the retro fad continues - sail power

[Andrew]

Chernobyl

[Rod Speed]

No it isn't, with most of them there is no JIT with those.

That's wrong too. more slow carriers cost more.

That's why the bulk mineral carriers are so f****ng large.

[Rod Speed]

No possibility of that.

[Colin Bignell]

Which was the point I was making.

You are not keeping up with the thread.

[Rod Speed]

And even with bulk carriers there just isnt enough area.

[Rod Speed]

They don't have enough area to be useful.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Precsiely Already down below 10% of the accident radiation levels.

Chernobyl is not a long lived nor a radioactive isotope It is a place. in Ukraine

[Rod Speed]

No it wasnt, you ignorantly claimed that a continuous supply is needed.

The reality is that they all use a very lumpy supply with stockpiles to spread out the lumpy deliverys at both ends.

Thats what those f****ng great tanks are there for with fossil fuels and massive great piles with other stuff like coal, minerals etc.

Yes I am, I have read every single post in it.

Slow carriers means more ships used and so costs more for the customer.

[Colin Bignell]

They could make them hybrid :-)

[Rod Speed]

But still wouldnt have enough area to be worth the stupid cost of getting them out of the way when loading and unloading the bulk freight.

[Chris Hogg]

What they need is Carter the Farter.

When the wind wouldn't blow and the ship wouldn't go, they'd get Carter the Farter would start 'er!