Hi all We have a fairly crude 70's style wardrobe fitted inside a large alcove in the 'master bedroom'. This needs replacing; I'd live to do it myself [*] but sufficient time & opportunity not being available I have got a couple of local men in to spec the job.
The current construction, using 3x2 timber to make a frame, and thick (40mm?) inset door panels, can be seen in some photos below. The frame is built directly into the wall...
The first does what I'd call a proper carpentry job; from what I can tell he constructs a piece/pieces of furniture of the exact shape required, give or take, then 'slides' it into the space, screws to the wall (via padding pieces, I think, and finishes. He uses standard butt hinges, with the doors (eg. 18mm MDF) fitted into the carcass.
The second builds the wardrobe in place, from what I can tell; a timber frame similar to the current arrangement, but perhaps less hefty, and then the doors are laid 'onset'(?); I think he uses Blum-type hinges similar to kitchen cupboards.
I suppose my preference would be for the former as a slightly classier job; but the trouble is that it would seem to lose a bit of depth from the alcove. This is already a bit on the shallow side for a wardrobe (around
52cm front-to-back for clothes), and although we can bring the front out a whisker, I'm concerned that the thickness of a proper back (the back of the current wardrobe is plaster!) together with the gap between that and the wall will reduce the depth even further.The second method would seem to give a bit more depth, but I wonder slightly about the constructional method, and whether there are any downsides that I don't know about. I'd be interested to know of any thoughts on the relative merits of these approaches.
Thanks a lot jon N
[*] Obligatory DIY part - I will be doing most of the rest of the refurb; any wardrobe painting necessary, fitting new radiator, making floorboards good, fitting carpet grippers & underlay etc. etc. ;-)