>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
> >>> ...... =A0howler was that breeze blocks were just compacted ash and
> >>> cinder without cement to bond it together
>
> >> I am sure that you can point out that post from Dave which said that -= unless
> >> you are lying.
>
> >> Smith claimed that breeze blocks *were* concrete blocks.
>
> >> They aren't.
>
> > Wikipedia is often wrong, but I don't think so in this case:
>
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3DQuote=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > Concrete blocks are made from cast concrete, i.e. Portland cement and
> > aggregate, usually sand and fine gravel for high-density blocks. Lower
> > density blocks may use industrial wastes as an aggregate. Those that
> > use cinders (fly ash or bottom ash) are called cinder blocks in the
> > US, breeze blocks (breeze is a synonym of ash)[1] in the UK and are
> > also known as besser blocks or bricks in Australia.
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D/Quote=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> >formatting link> I also think it's wrong to distinguish breeze blocks from concrete blocks= .
> Not all concrete blocks are breeze blocks, but all breeze blocks are (a f= orm
> of) concrete block.
>
> That we don't think of them as being concrete is just cultural.
>
> The Romans (who invented the stuff) produced even lighter concrete by mea= ns
> of using pumice (lightweight solidified volcanic lava) as the aggregate
> rather than the ash used for modern breeze blocks.
Surely uk.d-i-y could settle this argument? Medway will respect them.