Re: Royalty, births and parasites

michael adams wrote

>> There's plenty of evidence suggesting a direct correlation between measurable >> personality dimensions, such as >> openness to experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, >> agreeableness, and neuroticism (or emotionality) and peoples' political opinions. >> Al of which are set at birth, or during early socialization > > That is very arguable indeed. If that was true, the military > wouldn?t be able to have such a dramatic effect on those > who get involved in it. >

Except in war-time the military are a self selecting group appealing most to those who value discipline, order, and authority figures.

Outside of that, among conscripts and volunteers there's no evidence that military service had any noticeable uniform affect at all.

While among both conscripts and volunteers in World War One it appears that the whole ethos was often determined by the Country or Colony of origin.

michael adams

...

Reply to
michael adams
Loading thread data ...

Au contraire, for such examples of nurturing are possible to any of the humankind.

There's no evidence of that. especially taking into account the pre-war gerrymandering so as not to pay income tax.

There's no evidence of that. Just because there are those who have set themselves up as leaders and exposed the rest of us to growing up in that situation, that is not evidence of a need.

Reply to
gareth

If you wish to express such an opinion, then please have the courage to do it in your own words, and do not try to put words into my mouth.

Reply to
gareth

From which, I take it you have no answer to the remainder of my post which you've chosen to snip.

And can produce no real support for your claims that history doesn't overwhelmingly support the idea that societies ever since the dawn of antiquity to the modern era - from the Pharaohs to Lenin, Stalin Mao etc. have shown a desire for figureheads.

michael adams

...

Reply to
michael adams

I had already dealt with the issue of you not dealing with my point that we do not NEED leaders, and so responding to your further digressions had no purpose.

I have not made any claim about history. Are you making this up as you go along?

Reply to
gareth

En el artículo , michael adams escribió:

Nah, they're all lizards. Don't you read David Icke?

Reply to
Mike Tomlinson

En el artículo , michael adams escribió:

He's a well-known troll, Michael. Been at it since 1997. Best ignored (i.e. don't feed his desire for attention.) Google "Gareth Alun Evans"

Reply to
Mike Tomlinson

Which was ?

michael adams

...

Reply to
michael adams

The fact that you've apprently never heard of Alfred the Great, Edward the Elder, ?lfweard, ?thelstan,Edmund I, Eadred,Eadwig, Edgar the Peaceful,Edward the Martyr, ?thelred the Unready, Sweyn Forkbeard, Edmund Ironside, nut,Harold Harefoot, Harthacnut, Edward the Confessor, Harold Godwinson, or Edgar the ?theling doesn't mean they never existed.

michael adams

...

>
Reply to
michael adams

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.