>
> Isn't there something slightly ironic about Fathers 4 Justice using, of
> all things, condoms, to throw at the PM in order to raise (must be some
> flour pun there) awareness for their campaign? And how likely is it that
> they'll see their kids now they've got criminal records?
The issue is global, not personal. In 98%of cases the child is given to the mother after a divorce. I know many mothers who are not fit enough.
The problem is that these people seem to be looking for solid laws to guarantee access, when there's nothing else for it but `case-by-case basis'.
They have a clear point and direct action is a last resort as all their other pleas for sanity have gone unheard.
But if they were reasonable people in the first place they would still be in contact with their kids, surely ? Maybe that's why their wife's or girlfriends got rid of them in the first place.
it and then the courts do nothing about it. Also the mother in many cases is living off of the fathers payments and gets legal aid to put their case the father paying for everyone has to pay his own legal side!!
The Q
I think the problem is that the mother is always deemed 'fit' by default, and the father isn't. Balanced treatment would help.
Don't you believe it, some women are influenced by others who may wish to see the fathers do not have access, whether the father is reasonable or not.
Until you have experienced this sort of situation do not attempt to give opinions.
I do assure you it is not pleasant for the child to be deprived of it's father.
Alan
Some of these mothers may live to regret that sort of action.
Sometimes the children discover what has put them in the situation of being fatherless and turn on the women who made them that way.
Alan
er- no ... I was talking about the people in Northern Ireland who didn't want to be part of a united Ireland, who hd to put up with the IRA attacks for 27 years ...
Cross posting cancelled.
Mary
Sadly not always true. That is just their point.
In message , Mary Fisher writes
Having suffered occupation for a good many years longer. Don't forget they see them selves as being having been invaded by the English
Tell us IMM, have you provided the world with little tool waving mini tango dancers?
Suzanne
Only in this country would we spend £600,000 on armoured glass to protect our politicians, and then sell raffle tickets for the priviledge of sitting in front of it!!!!!
So they should be hung?
Is that WELL hung ?
Nick
Suzanne,
Being a part time world-wide playboy, of course.
Only for stupidity surely - a clear line of aim to Blair, and all they throw is flour? ;-)
"Gary Cavie" wrote | Only for stupidity surely - a clear line of aim to Blair, and all | they throw is flour? ;-)
What should they have thrown - caustic soda? ;-)
Owain
omg it's Austin Powers. Groovy baby!
In message , IMM writes
The word's hanged, not hung
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required