OT Whinge

Sep 21, 2024 Last reply: 1 year ago 50 Replies

Why is it that most photos of incidents taken by witnesses are in vertical mode? Lots of foreground and sky but not much detail of the event.


Mobiles are organised with their home screens oriented that way, and the fatheads haven't worked out how to rotate the thing by 90.

I raised this in a Facebook group related to Dunkirk Little Ships* and to their credit they do now use landscape mode.

  • Great group:

formatting link
Left my dad behind though!

In message snipped-for-privacy@mid.individual.net>, Tim Streater snipped-for-privacy@streater.me.uk> writes

Hmm. They seem clever enough to get it published by the meja! I wondered if it was related to the button position or some other physical reason. The incident would be long over by the time my Nokia was ready to do anything:-)

>

Because they hold the smartphone as if they're going to speak into it, rather than using it as a camera.


Why is it that most photos of incidents taken by witnesses are in >vertical mode?


>Lots of foreground and sky but not much detail of the event.

Your lot: "do not worry the goy* will pay for it"


goy means sub animal

I once took a trip on the Lady Cable, and I remember seeing a small brass plaque commemorating her time at Dunkirk rescuing some 550 soldiers.

Unfortunately she is the subject of an ownership dispute, and has not yet been restored.

I see she is mentioned on the ADLS web site:

formatting link

Really, this is a manufacturing defect. It ought to be possible to take landscape photos, whilst holding the phone vertically, if vertical is more comfortable to hold.

Le 21/09/2024 à 09:43, Tim Lamb a écrit :

Hello oldie. It's called Tiktok, Instagram, etc!

Because the takers are too young to remember what a real camera was, and what its product looked like by default. Aperture? Shutter speed? ISO rating? What are they?

Vaguely related is this fad for "reels" that treat the runtime as a cold war state secret.

Indeed. It's a long time ago! Kodachrome 64 etc.

Ektachrome, Ilford FP3, .......

Patterson d-i-y processing equipment....still in a cupboard somewhere...

-- Davey.

  • Paterson I think.

I did a lot of work making monochrome slides using FP3. Great fun. (it was for school, who couldn't afford colour for a project)

A lovely film indeed

Slightly too green for me. All my slides are Kodachome 25 (or Kodachrome 2, as it had previously been known).

Panchromatic...

Oh the technology!

It's a bit like 'renewable energy' - the amount of tech and kit to get a substandard image was immense. And then one day, the digital camera... And worse still, computer ground lenses that were better than anything before them at about 20% of the price! Chuck in autofocus, and any dumb pleb could take a picture.

Let's hope we see nuclear power do the same in the power generation industry

Odd. I found it rather too red. For greens I used Agfa or Fuji.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required