OT Wealth Transfer.

No it wasn't

What I do is legal and benrficial to the community.

My (first) lot of panels has paid for it'self already. Income is around 12% tax free. And inflation linked.

Tell me where else I can get a risk/tax free income of 12%? Also a reduction of 25%/35% off my electricity bills Also powers my electric car for free.

Cost?

BTW, I don't know anyone whose inverter has failed.

Oh yes it was.

the only people that benefit are you & the system seller/installer. The rest of us pay for it.

She didn't do anything, and so what. For her the value has not increased. She had a house - she still has a house.

Let's not dignify it with the word "income", eh harry? What you are actually talking about is the proceeds of your FIT crime.

Legalised banditry takes place in the US, too. And that isn't beneficial to the community either.

The immigrants are allegedly, according to their stinking supporters, beneficial to the community

What harry does is legal theft and not beneficial to any community except his nest of white mice.

Oh no it wasn't - not to those who couldn't afford the capital investment nor those who owned an east west facing house, nor to tenants.

You ARE a whinging git. A scoialist I 'spect. I expect you went to a state funded school? Free bus Pass? Library?

Ignorant as usual. Solar panels can be fitted to East/West facing roofs. There is a 25%reduction in generation.

Can't afford??? Well that's just down to idleness and stupidity. If you're poor, it's your own fault. Anybody in this country prepared to work can be well off, even rich.

The mirror is over there.

harry, you are full of s*it. If everybody was well off there wouldn't be anyone to do the menial stuff for low pay. That is the problem. A large proportion are relatively well off and unprepared to do the menial stuff, hence the need for immigrants.

You're as ignorant as ever then.

NT

NT

Arguably, it creates an initial demand enabling producers to invest in development of cheaper products for the benefit of all.

tim

Well that if course was the bullshit excuse used to justify it.

The narrative was

- we need to stop emitting CO2

- we will therefore use renewable energy

- its far too expensive so we will subsidise it

- it will then become magically cheaper and we wont need to subsidise it.

Of course it was all lies from the start and more importantly, all the engineers involved knew it.

The real narratives is

- we don't need to stop emitting CO2.

- even if we did, nuclear is far and away cheaper than renewables ever will be .

- its so expensive we should never subsidise it.

- it hasn't become magically cheaper at all, of course.

Because all this was known from the outset, those involved are guilty of fraud.